Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Schedule Organisation Issue

22 ANTWORTEN 22
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 23
Anonymous
4309 Aufrufe, 22 Antworten

Schedule Organisation Issue

Hi,

 

I am just putting a few schedules together in our Revit templates and have come across an ordering issue when I try and sort them by Associated Level.

 

So I have created a View schedule with two sorting actions the first is the family (header is ticked also), then the associated level (ascending). The schedule does not put the levels in order correctly. (see below screen shoot)

 

 

View Schedule Issue.png

 

Has anyone else come across this and if so how did you get around it?

 

Thanks

 

Gareth

22 ANTWORTEN 22
Nachricht 2 von 23
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

The levels correctly sorted based on the ascending order.  If you want them sorted by elevations of the levels then add prefix to the level name.

Nachricht 3 von 23
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

If you look at the project browser they are ordered by Associated Level in ascending order. Which is correct. 

 

I have set the schedule up in the same way apart from including it to sort by family first. So it should order them by level in ascending order but it does not. Even if I remove the sort by family, it still does not work. 

 

You don't have the option to add levels to the view schedule I could do this add an extra parameter to help control this. Which is going to create more work and I do not have the time to do that.

Nachricht 4 von 23
chrisplyler
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

In a schedule, they sort ALPHABETICALLY by the name of the Level, not by their elevation value.

Nachricht 5 von 23
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Wouldn't just sorting them by Elevation put then in the correct order? 

Nachricht 6 von 23
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: barthbradley


@Anonymous wrote:

Wouldn't just sorting them by Elevation put then in the correct order? 


It would if the Elevation parameter were available for View schedules.

 

@Anonymous  below is what I meant by adding prefix for sorting

 

Capture.PNG

Nachricht 7 von 23
Sahay_R
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

In the template - can a Shared Parameter be added to views - elevation value entered - and then schedule sorted by that Shared Parameter? At this point I think this could be the only way to achieve what the OP wants.

 

@barthbradley - yes, you're right, it should be Project Parameter..... I'm SO ready for the weekend!!


Rina Sahay
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Architecture Certified Professional

If you find my post interesting, feel free to give a Kudo.
If it solves your problem, please click Accept to enhance the Forum.
Nachricht 8 von 23
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Sahay_R

You mean Project Parameter, @Sahay_R

 

Sort by "Altitude"...a PP? 

 

 

 

..."Altitude"= the elevation Smiley (zwinkernd)

Nachricht 9 von 23
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Yes @Sahay_R, and then the OP can just enter a value inside the schedule. 

Nachricht 10 von 23
Sahay_R
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Not inside the schedule- in the properties of the view.

Rina Sahay
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Architecture Certified Professional

If you find my post interesting, feel free to give a Kudo.
If it solves your problem, please click Accept to enhance the Forum.
Nachricht 11 von 23
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Sahay_R

What I was talking about was adding a project parameter to all the sheets from within the schedule, and then placing a value for that parameter directly into the parameter field through the schedule - not by opening each view and assigning one to it. 

Nachricht 12 von 23
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Sahay_R

It does appear that out the box you Revit won't order them by level correctly. 

 

@Sahay_R mentioned I could add a parameter in but I do not wish to add a further step for users to do. This is only going to create much more work. 

Nachricht 13 von 23
Sahay_R
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Rename the levels - as the elevation height OR at least begin the level name with the elevation height - of course, if this is acceptable by your office standards. Revit will prompt you to ask if the views should be renamed accordingly - don't accept the prompt.


Rina Sahay
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Architecture Certified Professional

If you find my post interesting, feel free to give a Kudo.
If it solves your problem, please click Accept to enhance the Forum.
Nachricht 14 von 23
Alfredo_Medina
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

@Anonymous  How can Revit sort the levels in the order that you expect by just their names? The name is text data, not numeric data. Therefore, Revit will sort those names in alphabetical order, as it has been mentioned above.


Alfredo Medina _________________________________________________________________ ______
Licensed Architect (Florida) | Freelance Instructor | Profile on Linkedin
Nachricht 15 von 23
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Sahay_R

@Sahay_R I can't rename the levels. They are named to match our standards, which needs to be consistent across all projects and models.

 

 

@Alfredo_Medina I am not ordering them by the names, it is by the associated level as noted above. Starting from the foundation level, basement, ground, first, etc. If Revit is to order the levels by the level position (as shown in attached image) on which they are drawn it should order them correctly. 

 

Level Order_001.png

Nachricht 16 von 23
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Anonymous


@Anonymous wrote:

If Revit is to order the levels by the level position (as shown in attached image) on which they are drawn it should order them correctly. 

 

 


I wish they could be ordered by elevation value but alas.  I always add a number prefix in the level name so they sort properly but I can understand you must stay with your office standards.  I suggest you submit an idea to Autodesk, see the link in my signature.

Nachricht 17 von 23
Alfredo_Medina
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Yes, but "Associated Level" is text data, not numeric data, so Revit is sorting those names correctly. 


Alfredo Medina _________________________________________________________________ ______
Licensed Architect (Florida) | Freelance Instructor | Profile on Linkedin
Nachricht 18 von 23
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

I will be submitting an idea, but if it orders the project browser by levels as drawn. Surely it would do the same in schedules.
Nachricht 19 von 23
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Alfredo_Medina

If its by text data why has it ordered the levels correctly in the project browser?
Nachricht 20 von 23
Alfredo_Medina
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

For a schedule of views, Associated Level is text data, just the name of the level. For Browser Organization, Associated Level is actually "Level", the elevation numeric value. Inconsistent? Yes, it is. Your browser organization is sorting by Type of  View, then by Associated Level. Notice in the Browser Organization Properties that the options for using characters is disabled (highlighted in this image), therefore Revit is using the numeric value.

 

2018-01-29_12-16-54.jpg


Alfredo Medina _________________________________________________________________ ______
Licensed Architect (Florida) | Freelance Instructor | Profile on Linkedin

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report