Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Revit Phases - problem

12 ANTWORTEN 12
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 13
Anonymous
915 Aufrufe, 12 Antworten

Revit Phases - problem

Hello

I need to make an architectural plan where the phases of the project are indicated, like the walls that will be demolished and that will be constructed, however we use a different representation pattern for walls that will be built in masonry and for those that will be made in drywall.
But Revit does not give me that option, for him, everything that is new has a single representation.
How do you work on this issue?
Consider that the attached image is just an example, the project I'm currently working on is more complex and overlapping the graphic elements individually is somewhat laborious.

Thankful

Revit Phases.jpg

 

 

12 ANTWORTEN 12
Nachricht 2 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

You can Phase Parts as well. Is that what you want to do? 

 

...select the Wall and create Parts, then select a wall layer and check out it's instance properties.  

Nachricht 3 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

We would normally show this information on separate drawings. A phases Drawing (Exitsing/New/Demolished) and a separate wall/partition types plan. Do you have a specific need to have these represented in the same drawing?  

Nachricht 4 von 13
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Look into Phasing > Phase Filter tab:  The New Column should be "By Category", not "Overridden" for the Filters where you want what you want.

Nachricht 5 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Yes, that's right, and that's where the problem arises, the type of Revit representation for what is New (phases) is unique, ie, everything that is New is represented with a single fill pattern, but I need two types (at least).

Nachricht 6 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Interesting, but the standard that is used here is to be on the same board.

Nachricht 7 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

I understand, but you lose some of the practicality of the tool phases, is it not possible for me to create a filter with an exception type for the dry wall, for example? I've tried, but I have succeeded.

Nachricht 8 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Sounds like why we create single layer walls (e.g. actually model the layers as basic wall types and sandwich them).  

Nachricht 9 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

I think @ToanDN's solution is probably the one to go with interns of looking at whats overridden. If you set the new phases in the phase graphic overrides to not override the essentially you can use something like filters to override the viability per wall type to get them to display how you wish. That's what i have done for the image below. I've removed the graphic override for proposed and then added a filter to highlight each wall type. Hope this is of some use. 

 

Capture.JPGCapture1.JPG

Nachricht 10 von 13
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Anonymous


@Anonymous wrote:

I understand, but you lose some of the practicality of the tool phases, is it not possible for me to create a filter with an exception type for the dry wall, for example? I've tried, but I have succeeded.


 

You can use  a combination of Rule based filters and Selection filters.  Pay attention to the order of them on the filter list.

 

In the example below, the line type and cut pattern of the existing and new are controlled by Phase Graphic Override.  the selection filters only control the cut line colors.

 

Capture1.PNG

Nachricht 11 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

I guess it's just how you read the OP's question. I read: "we use a different representation pattern for walls that will be built in masonry and for those that will be made in drywall."   I don't know what that has to do with Phasing Graphic Overrides.

Nachricht 12 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Maybe I did not use the clear terms, sorry. But the question is somewhat simple, we have a "Architecture Plan" board, in it we identify the walls that will be removed, all of them will be removed, so whatever material they are made will be removed and represented in red.
But when we build the walls, we have different types of materials, "Masonry Wall" and "dry wall", so we need to have two types of representation for New (phases), because otherwise it will not give the impression that all walls will be of the same material, and it is not.

I'm from Brazil, so maybe the terms are a bit different.

Nachricht 13 von 13
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

Yes, I tested your solution and it worked for me, I want to thank everyone for the attention and especially your solution.

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report