Project team working in central/local Revit 2021, Multifamily project, doing interior bathroom and kitchen elevations.
When we create the interior elevation views the elevation tag, circle and arrow/point, show up properly in all plan views. When we take those same views and place them on a sheet, either the host sheet of the plan view, or a different one, the specific view arrow disappears. The other, unplaced view arrows still show up, and the circle shows the sheet number of the placed view. However, they do show up in the associated RCP. Other elevation types, building, do work in other views, just not any of the unit plans. The unit plans have a template.
We have tried adjusting the crop regions, and annotation crop as well.
Tried changing the scales and detail level of both the host plan view, and elevations.
Tried deleting and recreating the views.
The interior elevation does reference the same floor plan as the host plan view.
We have tried using other elevation types, building or duplicated views.
We have checked Visibility Graphics and our templates and didn't see anything that was off or different between the two, besides the host view type. We have tried changing the template, or going to none, and the same problem arises.
We have tried changing the view range, cut plane.
No phases, or design options, we have changed the worksets and the same issue exists.
Other users have the same issue.
Opening and closing the file, saving/syncing/reloading latest, does nothing.
The issue seems like its view/template specific. But we don't have a different view type for Overall plans vs unit plans, and we have tried removing the templates from the equation. And the interior elevation tag "arrow" is visible UNTIL it is placed on a sheet.
I have run out of ideas so I am reaching out for help.
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von ToanDN. Gehe zur Lösung
Sharing a stripped down model that exhibits the behavior would be helpful.
Sounds like it may be related to "Hide at scales coarser than". Select the marker and you'll see "Hide at scales coarser than" in its properties.
I don't think I will be able to share, client is particular about privacy. (It would take longer for me to neuter the model enough to share, vs manually creating annotative fixes).
Sorry, I can't share.
I don't think "Hide at scales coarser than" is the issue, will try though. The RCP (shows up fine) and the Plan (doesn't show up) are the same scale, and we have tried changing the scales up and down. from 1/8" up to 1/2" and down to 1:40.
Check the floor plan's view filters. There may be some filters that Hide specific elevations when their sheet number matching certain criteria.
@ToanDN that was it, sort of.
It was a filter, once we turned it off it worked. But the filter was to hide UNPLACED SECTIONS when PRINTING. This was hiding placed elevations when just modeling. Seems like a pretty big glitch from Revit. Maybe interior elevations aren't considered elevations, they aren't when you really think about it, just interesting the way Revit handled this filter.
@Jhand wrote:
@ToanDN that was it, sort of.
It was a filter, once we turned it off it worked. But the filter was to hide UNPLACED SECTIONS when PRINTING. This was hiding placed elevations when just modeling. Seems like a pretty big glitch from Revit. Maybe interior elevations aren't considered elevations, they aren't when you really think about it, just interesting the way Revit handled this filter.
Can you show the Filter Rules? Based on what you described, the rules may need to reverse.
No need for a filter. Revit has a function for that. That filter sounds like it needs to be unchecked when printing only.
So, it doesn't even look like the filter was set up to actually filter anything. See below. None of the categories are checked, elevations or sections; and there are no actual rules set to it.
Unfortunately, because this filter was part of a template, the rules Revit is (mis)applying are still there once we remove the filter. We are having to go back and re-place the views to get the view tags to show up properly.
Agreed. It sounds like the team was having to do a presentation to a client straight from the Revit file (never a good idea imo) and applied the filter to just clean things up for that one presentation. And then instead of deleting it, they just removed the rules and categories in the filter; and somehow it grabbed placed elevations????
@Jhand wrote:
So, it doesn't even look like the filter was set up to actually filter anything. See below. None of the categories are checked, elevations or sections; and there are no actual rules set to it.
Unfortunately, because this filter was part of a template, the rules Revit is (mis)applying are still there once we remove the filter. We are having to go back and re-place the views to get the view tags to show up properly.
If the intent is not showing Unplaced sections and elevations in views then you can reverse the filter rule (Sheet Number less than 0), re-enable the filter from the template and see if it works as expected.
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.