hello everybody,
i am trying to do something revit unfortunately doesnt want me to - perhaps someone's got a work around for that...
say i divide a building in 4 parts, A, B, C, D and create a sheet for each part (red dots for part A):
The parts should be treated separately, so that the clouds in part B, C and D shouldnt create a new revision in the schedule from part A, which obviously happen every time a cloud that belongs to this parts appear in part's A sheet. I dont mind seeing the clouds, i just dont want them to create a new revision in the "wrong" revision schedule (they should create a revision number in their own sheets though).
Everything would be easier if Revit wouldnt gray out the option "Shown in Revision Schedule" under "Revisions on Sheet"...
Thanks!
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von ToanDN. Gehe zur Lösung
that would work indeed. the problem is that i also need to divide part A in 4 sheets (4 dependent views).
In this case i would have to draw each cloud more than once, one for the overview (1:100) and one for each dependent view (1:50)...
If A, B, C, D are to be separate then they should be different views altogether, not dependent views. Then clouds on views B, C, D should not affect view A.
Then for enlarged dependent views A1 A2 A3 A4, you still want to cloud them per view because a cloud must be entirely within the view crop region in order to appear.
Hi
I wanted to give a simple solution, but in the process this might be bit complicated and would
need a proper planning..
But the idea is, you can customize how " Revision Schedule shows up"
and to get rid of duplicated revision, you can use " Grey " text and " Grey " background to hide it...
use a correct sorting system ...hope this will give some direction..
heres the screen short of small test..
revision, schedule format ( Edit sheet, edit schedule )
three conditions, for three parameters, turning backgorund to grey.. but this can be matched with text to hide it...
Thanks!
Thats correct, A, B, C and D are indeed different views. What happens is that i need view A by example in two different scales, say 1:100 (Sheet 01 - overview) and 1:50 (Sheets 02, 03, 04 and 05), and that's why i need the dependent views. To that i have to say that we use the same plan view for both scales, duplicating the sheet's size and printing 50% so that the annotations dont have to be done twice / rearranged.
Now your argument about the cloud within the view crop is obviously a strong one... That just means for us that we would have to draw two clouds for each change - one in the 1:100 sheet and one in the 1:50 sheet. Is that correct?
Cheers!
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.