Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Railings: extend intermediate rails

8 ANTWORTEN 8
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 9
kmillerBHFJ6
668 Aufrufe, 8 Antworten

Railings: extend intermediate rails

Special railing condition here: We need to switch railing types where it meets the landing so the intermediate rails should extend past the start of the landing to match the second railing. I was thinking an angled end baluster would force the intermediates past the start of the landing but no luck. It seems the intermediate rails always go horizontal at the top of the stair it is hosted to. Any tricks? Desired condition below.

 

kmillerBHFJ6_1-1701195439747.png

 

kmillerBHFJ6_2-1701195867691.png

 

Tags (2)
Beschriftungen (1)
8 ANTWORTEN 8
Nachricht 2 von 9
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: kmillerBHFJ6

Why don't you do it as one contiguous railing? 

 

Contiguous.png

Nachricht 3 von 9
kmillerBHFJ6
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Unfortunately the existing landing type switches to 7 intermediates while the stair only has 6. You'll notice the spacing of the 6 is consistent but the landing has an additional run near the floor. Its a strange condition that I've never seen but we need to match the existing.

Nachricht 4 von 9
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: kmillerBHFJ6

something along these lines? 

 

Continuous22.png

 

Continuous33.png

Nachricht 5 von 9
kmillerBHFJ6
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

So that is closer but because the stair railing direction change is aligned there is a resulting large space between the stringer and bottom rail. If the alignment of this direction change can offset the spacing of the stair intermediates starts to even out...

 

Nachricht 6 von 9
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: kmillerBHFJ6

I'm not clear on what you're saying.  Mine was just a quick example. The spacing of the railings wouldn't change the 2 adjoining Railing Types approach. No? 

 

 

Nachricht 7 von 9
kmillerBHFJ6
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Any tricks you can think of to get this?

 

kmillerBHFJ6_0-1701200994166.png

 

Nachricht 8 von 9
kmillerBHFJ6
als Antwort auf: kmillerBHFJ6

Looks like a model in place connection for now but open to suggestions, thank you for your input

 

kmillerBHFJ6_0-1701202679441.png

 

Nachricht 9 von 9
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: kmillerBHFJ6

AH! I see now!  :zwinkerndes_Gesicht:

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report