HI
i have a multi building project that consists of up to 30 buildings with some landscapes , is revit good enough to model them in the same model ??
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von ToanDN. Gehe zur Lösung
I would model each building as a separate file and link them in a master site file. Even if your computer is capable of build everything in one model, it is not the recommended approach.
Revit is good enough. The real questions are:
1. Is your COMPUTER good enough?
2. SHOULD you model them all together in one file anyway?
I can't answer #1. The answer to #2 is NO.
Each stand-alone building should be modeled, without any site info, in its own project file. A "master" site file should be created. Each building file should be linked into the master site file, rotated/moved into position on the site, and then have the site file's coordinates shared back into each building file. The headaches of doing it this way will be far less than those of modeling thirty buildings in a single project file.
Besides, if there are multiple identical buildings, then you will only need to model the building once, and insert the model multiple times in your final composite model. Less redundancy!
@NERDASORUS: This really comes down to whether or not your company has their own custom RTE and/or development standards that are religiously applied to every project . If not, and your building environment is developed "on the fly", then STARTING the project, as a whole, in one environment and then breaking it up later will aid in maintaining consistency across projects. That was my point. I'm in total agreement with @chrisplyler otherwise. And, obviously, Shared Coordinates will be the glue you need when you do break them up.
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.