Basically the ground floor is like a dashboard where I test all the possible families.
I am courious if this is the way you work too? Or is it better to have another project like a template project to cut and paste the things that I need?
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von L.Maas. Gehe zur Lösung
Hi,
We have a Revit template containing all families on the ground level. Whenever we begin a project, we utilize this template and remove any unnecessary elements. As a result, the template remains updated with the appropriate project parameters and so forth.
However, feel free to explore and discover what approach suits you best.
Select Accept as Solution and Likes are always welcome.
Ralph den Haan, (Lazy) BIM Specialist
Hi, thanks, I also thought that having a template with 3D families would be better. In a way I am building it right now by doing this.
The thing is that I change and switch families back and forth in the early stages of the design so I would probably delete them quite late in the project, maybe towards CD stage At least some of them.
There is not a really fixed workflow. Often companies choose between several methods.
1-Create one (or a few) barebones project template and after starting a project load in the families you need.
2-Create a filled template with lots of information and families and then remove all what is not needed for the project.
3-Create a template filled with the most common things and then load/delete what is (not) needed.
It depends on your work. Do your projects look all similar or do they vary a lot between projects?
Same for the families, do you have a huge library and do the families change a lot?
You have to find the sweetspot in efficiency and maintainability. Loading/removing families vs maintenance of project templates and family libraries.
Louis
Please mention Revit version, especially when uploading Revit files.
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.