Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Is there a good way to reset level tags?

4 ANTWORTEN 4
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 5
svalente9GJKH
301 Aufrufe, 4 Antworten

Is there a good way to reset level tags?

I reused a file to start a project (I know, I should be stating with a temple instead....) 

 

I deleted the old building and my new building is very far from the original.  

 

When I go to setup elevation views, there are no elevation tags because they are where the old building was.

 

Is there a good way to reset these so that they show up in the new views?  Is elongation the new view and then stretching down the only way?

 

Thanks

 

4 ANTWORTEN 4
Nachricht 2 von 5
SteveKStafford
als Antwort auf: svalente9GJKH

Make sure you model close to the internal origin. Being far from the origin can have a negative impact on viewing and printing the model accurately. Far away is more than 10 miles from the origin. If elevations look like they are using wireframe when set to hidden line that's an indication something is too far from the origin. DWG files often cause this problem when linked or imported. Also if you see jagged lines or if snapping doesn't seem to land on the element when you place your cursor on an endpoint, for example, is another symptom.

 

If you can't see any levels, sketch a new one in the view, or find any view you have that they are visible in. Then select it (or any that you can see) and right click to select all instances in the project. Then right click to maximize 3D extents. You can delete the new level afterward.


Steve Stafford
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
EESignature

Nachricht 3 von 5
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: svalente9GJKH


@svalente9GJKH wrote:

I reused a file to start a project (I know, I should be stating with a temple instead....) 

 

 

There's nothing wrong with that workflow. Starting a new project from an old project IS essentially starting from a "template" - a better one. The question I have is why "the new building is very far from the original" ?  By doing this, you are defeating the benefits of starting a new project from an old project.  What is your reasoning for modeling another building in relationship to a building that isn't there? Why not model the new building in the same spot as the deleted building? 

Nachricht 4 von 5
svalente9GJKH
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Because I had the overall site plan (its a large scale development) overlaid in plan already

with the new building on it. I didn't want to have to reorient the building/site.

Nachricht 5 von 5
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: svalente9GJKH


@svalente9GJKH wrote:

Because I had the overall site plan (its a large scale development) overlaid in plan already

with the new building on it. I didn't want to have to reorient the building/site.


 

Huh? You don't want to move/reorient the site plan?   Why?  Serious question. Again, it sounds like you are modeling your new building in relationship to the old building - which doesn't exist in the new project anymore.  In other words, the site relates to the old building - not the new building.  Know what I mean?  

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report