Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Infilling element replaced by a later phase insert must be the same type as the

40 ANTWORTEN 40
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 41
robertovalentino
17190 Aufrufe, 40 Antworten

Infilling element replaced by a later phase insert must be the same type as the

 Hi all

 

I keep having the following quite annoying warning in a project of mine every time I try to change a wall

 

"Infilling element replaced by a later phase insert must be the same type as the insert's host."

 

I have been using Phases for ages even on a quit complex project and this is the first time i see it.

 

Any suggestion?

thank you so much in advance

 

 

40 ANTWORTEN 40
Nachricht 2 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: robertovalentino

I've had them before. It's an order-of-operation thing usually.  

 

Does this sound like your particular issue:

 

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/revit-products/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles...

Nachricht 3 von 41
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: robertovalentino

You get the error message if you change the wall type after you already demo'd something from that wall in the next phase(s).

Nachricht 4 von 41
robertovalentino
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Actually I got no demo at all

I just added windows in the next Phase

 

Anyway I tried to flatten all the phases leaving only one and I still get the error

 

quite annoying 

Nachricht 5 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: robertovalentino


@robertovalentino wrote:

 Hi all

 

I keep having the following quite annoying warning in a project of mine every time I try to change a wall

 

"Infilling element replaced by a later phase insert must be the same type as the insert's host."

 

I have been using Phases for ages even on a quit complex project and this is the first time i see it.

 

Any suggestion?

thank you so much in advance

 

 


That wall.  Did you draw it from scratch or did it appear from demolition of an older phase door/window/opening?

Nachricht 6 von 41
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: robertovalentino

A new window or door in an existing wall is going to still have an infil element, only it is something being removed.

That is why you see dashed lines where the window/door is being removed in the demo view.

(this brings up another issue already mentioned in the Ideas that the line of the width of the wall should show as well)

Nachricht 7 von 41
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

And here I just tested it out and I cannot replicate.  I know I have gotten the error message too.  But I had an existing wall with an existing door to be demo'd, a new door in the next phase...changed the wall in Existing and New and no issues.  (shrug)

Nachricht 8 von 41
robertovalentino
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

hi, 

this is what I did

 

1 - I drew the wall X in Phase A

2 - I added windows in Phase B (phase B is after phase A, I need that because i need Revit to count wall area without windows)

3 - I try to replace wall X with wall Y 

4 - I got error :leicht_lächelndes_Gesicht:

 

thank you so much for bothering to help me out, really appreciated

 

Nachricht 9 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: robertovalentino

You missed the part describing how you replaced "wall X with wall Y". What method did you use?  

Nachricht 10 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Here is how I replicate it:

 

- create a wall under Existing, demo it under New

- place a door under New in that wall

- set the view's phase to New, phase status to Show All, change the infill wall to a different type will trigger the warning

 

I know the whole scenario doesn't make any logical sense but there it is.

 

Capture.PNG

 

Nachricht 11 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

It's documented, @ToanDN.  Incident ID: 118921

Nachricht 12 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Edit:  I tried the incident 118912 steps and I can change the wall type no problem.  What gives?

 

Sightly different:

 

Documented Incident ID 118912:

  1. Create a wall in existing phase.
  2. Place a window in existing phase.
  3. Demolish the winodw in new phase.
  4. Try to change the wall type.

 

My test:

  1. create a wall under Existing, demo it under New
  2. place a door under New in that wall
  3. set the view's phase to New, phase status to Show All
  4. change the infill wall to a different type will trigger the warning

 

 

P/S:  What's with the typo in a official document?  Sloppy!

Nachricht 13 von 41
Alfredo_Medina
als Antwort auf: ToanDN


@ToanDN wrote:

Here is how I replicate it:

 

- create a wall under Existing, demo it under New

- place a door under New in that wall

- set the view's phase to New, phase status to Show All, change the infill wall to a different type will trigger the warning

 

I know the whole scenario doesn't make any logical sense but there it is.

 

 

 


 

 

Isn't there a contradiction in that sequence?  "Place a door under New in that wall" (in the wall that was just demolished in the previous step) ???


Alfredo Medina _________________________________________________________________ ______
Licensed Architect (Florida) | Freelance Instructor | Profile on Linkedin
Nachricht 14 von 41
Anonymous
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

It works just fine for me too.  What version of Revit are we supposed to be working with?  I have 2017.2.

Nachricht 15 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: ToanDN

Okay, we'll add yours as Incident ID:118921.

 

What's the method @robertovalentino used though? Maybe it will qualify as an Incident ID: 118921.2.  Smiley (zwinkernd)

Nachricht 16 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: Alfredo_Medina

Please read the last sentence.
Nachricht 17 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Anonymous

Works for me too, @Anonymous. That's why I'm asking how @robertovalentino did it.  Maybe this isn't a Chernobyl incident. Maybe it's just an order-of-operation thing like I first said. 

Nachricht 18 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: barthbradley


@barthbradley wrote:

Works for me too, @Anonymous. That's why I'm asking how @robertovalentino did it.  Maybe this isn't a Chernobyl incident. Maybe it's just an order-of-operation thing like I first said. 


@Anonymous @barthbradley

What works for you guys?  The documented incident or the way I replicate the error?

Nachricht 19 von 41
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: ToanDN


@ToanDN wrote:

 

What works for you guys?  The documented incident or the way I replicate the error?

 

Answering for myself; I can draw wall X in Phase A; add a windows to wall X in Phase B; replace wall X with wall Y in Phase B.  Pretty much @robertovalentino's workflow, but without the error.  

Nachricht 20 von 41
ToanDN
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Now this one makes more sense and will create the error:

 

  1. create a wall under Existing
  2. place a door under New in that wall
  3. change the infill wall to a different type will trigger the error.

Only doors trigger the error.  Windows do not.

 

Capture.PNG

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report