Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

inconsistent stair cut line visibility

7 ANTWORTEN 7
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 8
jagostinho74
856 Aufrufe, 7 Antworten

inconsistent stair cut line visibility

Hello all,

 

Finding that the stair cut line visibility is inconsistently produced for a mirrored version of the same stair.

 

It can be fixed via changing the View Range with a Plan Region but  it just seems a bit odd to behave this way so I thought about sharing it with the community.

 

Is this intended behaviour or can it be classified as a bug?

 

Stair cut line visibility.png

 

 

RVT attached.

 

Thank you

Assistant BIM/CAD Manager

Manchester, UK


Beschriftungen (1)
7 ANTWORTEN 7
Nachricht 2 von 8
mpukas
als Antwort auf: jagostinho74

I have similar, but different, issues with stair cut lines not being consistent from one run of stairs to the next with the same view settings. I think the issue with your stair is that the cut line is being drawn from the same side of the stair at the same elevation/height, therefore same tread, and it's the direction of the cut line that is altered depending on which tread the cut line generated from. Instead of mirroring the stair, try drawing a new one in the opposite orientation and see how the cut lines behave. Otherwise, using a plan region is the only option I can see, and then stairs graphics can get weird with plan regions. 

Nachricht 3 von 8
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: jagostinho74

Enter a negative value for the Cut Line Angle. 

 

Cut Mark.jpgCut Mark 2.jpg

 

Cut Mark 4.jpg

Nachricht 4 von 8
jagostinho74
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

That will work @barthbradley , but I will loose the consistent orientation of the cut line and will require to duplicate the Stair Type. Both of these are not desirable.

Assistant BIM/CAD Manager

Manchester, UK


Nachricht 5 von 8
jagostinho74
als Antwort auf: mpukas

That's right, @mpukas . We are currently using Plan Regions to go around this problem. I was just wondering if there was something that I was missing.

Assistant BIM/CAD Manager

Manchester, UK


Nachricht 6 von 8
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: jagostinho74

I think I would duplicate the Stair Type.  This way I could identify the mirrored stairs in the Project. That information might come in handy -  especially if I need to troubleshoot other oddities cause by mirroring the stairs - which Autodesk warns us not to do.  

Nachricht 7 von 8
jagostinho74
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

That is an interesting point you make, indeed. There is some value on tracking which elements are being modelled with techniques that deviate from Autodesk's recommendations.

Assistant BIM/CAD Manager

Manchester, UK


Nachricht 8 von 8
raimierygr
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

I was having this problem and your recommendation worked for me. This is a townhouses project, where all linked models are the same but I made them making mirrors in the early stage of the project, Everything was fine, a good view range. Thank your for the solution.

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report