I'm a beginner of the revit, in this project, here, I'm trying to add land in front of the 1st step to keep stairs as a whole instead of extending the floor to the step (because the land has the same properties and belongs to the stair family, I think).
Really appreciate it, if anyone can help to fix this problem ![]()
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von RDAOU. Gehe zur Lösung
You can surely use a floor or model in place but your thinking is right in principle (why not in the stair)..however, landings in Revit cannot be below the base level of the stair. To add a landing at the bottom of the stair, you need to offset its base and to create a new landing type with X" thickness to suit the condition with the slab it connects to. (ie: a different type for different conditions/stages)
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
thank u for ur understanding. it will work well in the concept design. For construction drawings, however, most of the time they are not the same. Thank you for your help I just used component tool to create a new one. it's really frustrating for wasting time on these tricks.
Whether they stay the same or change from design to construction, I do not see how it makes any difference. You asked how does it work in stairs tool and the answer was
To work with any software one needs to learn how to use that software properly, that is not a waste of time but an investment in one's self and his/her skills. No?
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
It has a difference! like this project when it turns out to be construction. Depending on the structural calculation, it should be drawn like this. the land height does not equal the riser nor the floor. I just think the Revit sometimes make things even more complicated .
Not really it is not that complicated... the landing doesn't really need to be the height of the riser. It can be less and can be more (the riser height was an example). See Image below
However, in Revit the drop beam is not part of the landing, it is a separate component
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
that is what I exactly want, can u teach me how to make it different? I can't make the 1st steps different from the others. the landing height was locked no matter how I changed it
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.