My approach to this with Revit is the same as my approach with Autocad.
You archive the project file exactly as it comes in.
And you make the updates in your master file.
In both instances, there is so much in the files that does not need to be there for the FM consumers, that for your working set, you purge out the vast majority of the content anyway.
So, no, I'm probably not going to use the different cubicle families or whatever that come in with every renovation (because they're not going to have the exact room bounding properties I need for space management reporting anyway), so it's faster just to reuse what I already have to update only the parts of the renovations that you actually need.
It keeps things consistent, it doesn't introduce unknowns into your model. It might sound tedious, but, in my personal experience, it is usually the way to go.
I'm always happy to hear of others' experiences, though.
It has been at least two years since I did a Revit implementation for an FM client, and shoot, nearly 7 years since I was in charge of my old campus' CAD and BIM.
... now I feel old.
Anyway, since Autodesk archived their FM forum a few years ago, remember that there are owner / operator - specific topics over here: https://forums.augi.com/forumdisplay.php?519-Facilities-Management-In-Practice
It's not a super busy forum, but, most of the topics do stand up over time.
Melanie Stone
Facilities Data Management
IWMS / CAFM / CMMS / AutoCAD / Archibus / Tririga / Planon / MRI Manhattan CenterStone / Revit / data normalization, data mapping, reporting and process documentation
mistressofthedorkness.blogspot.com/