Section detail view
Plan view
Greeting all.
We are facing a challenge. Maybe the better modelers could pitch in.
The tile must be on floor elements & not in parts, in order to quantify. I sketched a ref. plane to show the cutting must be according to it. Should i do the entire thing as a family, a nested one, to be quantifiable later on?
Thank you and all the best...
I'm still not sure what you're trying to do but if you're using a drafting pattern and are trying to orient the joint to be perpendicular with the floor, change the orientation of the pattern to "Align with element".
If you're actually trying to model all those tiles, I would probably use a curtain system or sloped glazing.
Who dictates "The tile must be on floor elements & not in parts, in order to quantify"? Parts is the best tool for this task, including material take-off.
May I make a suggestion here. Don't model the tiles as individual components. It's not necessary for quantification and just adds weight to the project. A better BIM approach, would be to model the tile as a floor layer (with a Tile Model Surface Pattern for looks), and use a simple calculation parameter in a take-off schedule to compute the number of tiles. If you really need some View showing "individual" tiles, then use and divide Parts in those Views.
FWIW
P.S. If you are wanting to show a tile pattern using different tiles (e.g. materials), then draw your pattern using the Split Surface Tool.
If you can't use parts just use multiple floors. While floors can have multiple outlines, keep it minimal else you will get error messages
@barthbradley , thank you for your response. Should i come forward to the MC BIM dept. i'll present this solution. This was done in the Rev. 0 submission & was rejected because we have to place individual mark. Still i will try
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.