Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Connecting Railings

4 REPLIES 4
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 5
Anonymous
1069 Views, 4 Replies

Connecting Railings

Hi Revit community,

 

This might be a simple issue and I might be tackling it the wrong way.

However I need to have two heights, 900mm above the stair flight and 1200mm on the landing part.

Is there an efficient proper way to make those two types connect as shown in red on second picture?

Keeping one railing type and adjust the height on the "Edit path" (pink lines) isn't an option as the railing will move up instead of "stretching up".

 

Thanks for any help

 

 

Screenshot_24.jpgScreenshot_25.jpg

4 REPLIES 4
Message 2 of 5
RDAOU
in reply to: Anonymous

@Anonymous 

 

You need to split the Path on the landing into 2 segments...meaning the rain will be 3 Segments in the same sketch:

 

RDAOU_0-1638875494982.png

 

  1. Segment A: (For the Run) set to
    • Slop: By Host
    • Height Correction: By Type
  2. Segment B: (For the Landing - Transition piece) set to
    • Sloped
    • Height Correction: Custom with a value  300mm (ie: 1200-300)
  3. Segment C: (For the Landing - Straight piece) set to
    • Slope: Flat
    • Height Correction: Custom with a value 300mm

 

See GIF below

Stair rail.gif

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Message 3 of 5
Anonymous
in reply to: RDAOU

I really appreciate for making the GIF and I am certain a lot of other people will find it useful. However I was aware of this feature which I addressed earlier as the Edit Path (pink lines) part, but when I implemented this technique I ended up this. 

 

jacuJMH6N_0-1638875640002.png

Basically the railing moves up instead of stretching up and stays on the red line. So it might be a problem with the railing family instead?

 

I sincerely appreciate your help.

Message 4 of 5
RDAOU
in reply to: Anonymous

@Anonymous 

 

It depends on how you model the balusters...you seem to be using the bottom rail as the Base of the balusters which does not work in such case. 

 

For it to work using Railing, 

  1. Use the same method mentioned in previous reply 
  2. Plus 1 of the following options/settings

 

Option A: Using a Custom Baluster family which extend below the Host

  • Base of the Balusters need to be set to Host
  • Bottom Rail would be part of the Custom Baluster
  • Railing would be hosted to the Stair Directly

RDAOU_2-1638886349489.png

 

Option B: Using standard Balusters

  • Set the base of the Balusters to host
  • Use a Beam/Structural Framing for Bottom Rail
  • Railing element would be hosted to a demo'ed or Invisible host

RDAOU_3-1638886751327.png

 

 

 

An alternative to the above is to use a Curtain Wall Element ... but this you can save for a new post/question

 

 

 

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Message 5 of 5
Anonymous
in reply to: RDAOU

Very well explained answer, it helped me a lot. Thanks!

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Forma Design Contest


Autodesk Design & Make Report