Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

CAD IMPORTS ARE 1/32" OFF SCALE

13 ANTWORTEN 13
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 14
josephghaida
1369 Aufrufe, 13 Antworten

CAD IMPORTS ARE 1/32" OFF SCALE

For some reason when I import my .dwg into my Revit project the scale of all the walls and spaces are 1/32" off. I tried both auto detect and manually setting the units. I'm using Revit 2021 and Auto CAD 2020.

13 ANTWORTEN 13
Nachricht 2 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

Duly noted. What would you like us to do with this information?  

Nachricht 3 von 14
josephghaida
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Well, I’m trying to not have my CAD imports 1/32” off. Sorry, I should have specified that I don’t want my drawings 1/32” off everywhere. I can see why you’re confused. I’m sure most people work with their drawings 1/32” off, but not me if I can help it. Do you have any suggestions to import my CAD drawings so that they’re exactly 0” off scale? @Anonymous 

Nachricht 4 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: josephghaida


@josephghaida wrote:

Do you have any suggestions to import my CAD drawings so that they’re exactly 0” off scale?


 

 What do you mean by  "0-inch off scale"? 

Nachricht 5 von 14
syman2000
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

Can you attached a sample for us to look at? I like to see if the CAD drawing has obscure angle or have line that has Z-axis which can throw off the measurement. Thanks

Check out my Revit youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/scourdx
Nachricht 6 von 14
josephghaida
als Antwort auf: syman2000

Here is one of the .dwgs giving me issues. If you import into Revit and take measurements, you she see that they're inconsistent with the CAD measurements. At least that's what I'm getting. @syman2000 

Nachricht 7 von 14
syman2000
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

 

I've look at the CAD and set the unit precision to 1/256". Once I start dimension it, you will see some tiny fraction left over. When Same CAD link into Revit, you will see those fraction left over. This is a common issue when linking CAD into Revit. Most often I use CAD as background and redo the Revit with proper dimension.

 

CAD.png

Check out my Revit youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/scourdx
Nachricht 8 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

I have no issues. The Dimensions pulled in Revit are a dead on ballz match with the Dimensions pulled in AutoCAD -- as they should be.  

 

See for yourself. AutoCAD Dimensions shown in Magenta and Revit Dimensions shown in Black:  

 

CAD DIMS.jpg

 

@syman2000: What is this "common issue" you are referring to?   I have been regularly inserting and dimensioning AutoCAD Drawings in Revit for well over ten years, and I have never experienced a common issue.  Unless you count the "loose nut behind the keyboard" as the common issue.  If so, then yes; I've experienced that one.  :zwinkerndes_Gesicht:  

Nachricht 9 von 14
syman2000
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

The issue I have is every CAD drawing I've encounter always have slightly off axis or very small fraction which CAD user miss. Sometimes user work off UCS that is slightly off from WCS. If user don't watchout for these slight abnormality, it can throw the whole Revit into a mess. I've always encourage my teammate to double check CAD because you can start the project in the wrong foot and have no idea it has a huge impact on accuracy down the road especially the Construction documentation phase.

Check out my Revit youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/scourdx
Nachricht 10 von 14
josephghaida
als Antwort auf: syman2000

Yes, another firm gave me these drawings and they had dimensions drawn at a certain tolerance that don't match with my Revit's tolerance. As I draw walls with pick lines in Revit, they don't match up. Thus the project is all misaligned. Thanks for your help and not being a "passive aggressive nut behind a keyboard".

Nachricht 11 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

What's a "passive aggressive nut behind a keyboard"?  Never heard that one.  Sounds a bit rude though. That wasn't directed at me; was it?  

Nachricht 12 von 14
josephghaida
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

What gave you that idea? You’re having a lot of trouble following along on
this thread aren’t you? So many questions! Try to create a new post on the
forum man. This one is solved.
Nachricht 13 von 14
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

Might be a good time for you to review the Autodesk Participant Guidelines.  Hate to lose you as a member.  

 

https://www.autodesk.com/company/legal-notices-trademarks/autodesk-participant-guidelines-lite?_ga=2...

 

Welcome to the Forum!  

 

Have a good day!  

Nachricht 14 von 14
RobDraw
als Antwort auf: josephghaida

Tolerance is not an excuse for inaccuracies. Don't trust content from that source or any other that is intolerant.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report