it is adding some unnecessary calculation to my quantities schedule..
Thansk!
I don't understand the issue. You say the Building Pad is slightly higher than the top of the Toposurface. So what? Also, how does this mess with a Schedule? A Schedule of what? Topography? The Pad and the Topo are two separate Categories.
@barthbradley The pad is at the correct level, which is aready dug, but the toposurface is starting a tiny bit under it, which adds 0,02 m3 to my schedule instead of being a clean zero..
@tareqathamneh6QW84: I don't want to play guessing game anymore. Post your file here and I'll tell you exactly what's going on and what to do about it.
@barthbradley here is the file, thanks, I appreciate it.
there are no layers in the pad..
Solution is posted in Message #6.
Set the Pad's Height Offset from Level to ZERO.
@tareqathamneh6QW84 wrote:
I did, still there.
The topo itself already has 0.203 m3 Cut without the pad. Did you create it using Graded Region?
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.