BIM Interoperability Model Checker

BIM Interoperability Model Checker

jhallarsisatias
Enthusiast Enthusiast
358 Views
2 Replies
Message 1 of 3

BIM Interoperability Model Checker

jhallarsisatias
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I would like to build a check that will scan AND GENERATE A FAILED REPORT to all doors that qualifies on BOTH the following criterias:

 

1. The door is required to show the Clearance Zone for Adaptability use (see image)

2. The door is NOT COMPLIANT with the AS1428 minimum dimension (see image)

jhallarsisatias_2-1743642020906.png

If the Yes/No parameter is NOT ticked and DOES NOT COMPLY, the report should not yield a FAILED outcome. 

I tried creating 2 specific checks but it's giving me a result different to what I intend to. Here are the images of the checks, let me know if I made a mistake: 


Check 01: This check is giving me a 100% pass even if there is a door that is clearly fit to yield a failed report

jhallarsisatias_4-1743642247426.png

jhallarsisatias_5-1743642323946.png

Check 02: This check is giving me a 1 Fail even if the door is fully compliant and should obviously yield a 100% pass. The correct report only shows when I turned off the Clearance Zone Yes/No parameter. 

 

jhallarsisatias_6-1743642442442.png

 

jhallarsisatias_7-1743642572157.png

jhallarsisatias_8-1743642686548.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
359 Views
2 Replies
Replies (2)
Message 2 of 3

JasonKunkel
Collaborator
Collaborator
Accepted solution

It looks like the AS1428_Compliance parameter is generated from a formula. I don't know how the Model Checker will deal with that. But, I made a test check and I believe I got the results you are looking for.

 

I ran it against four doors: the four combinations of the AS1428_Clearance_Zone as yes/no and AS1428_Compliance as "Door Does not Comply" and "Door Complies." Only the door with the checkbox checked and "Door Does not Comply" returned as failed.

 

The Check Results is set to Fail when Matching Elements are found, and you can see the filters in the image attached.

 

door-check-filters.jpg


Jason Kunkel
Senior Practice Manager, Architecture and Engineering
CADD Microsystems Blog
RVIT Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
0 Likes
Message 3 of 3

jhallarsisatias
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Thanks Jason,

That's a good one. Actually, I tried swapping the 'parameter' filters and it did manage to comply with my requirements. Not sure if the positioning of the filter has some weight on how Model Checker treats the data. Thanks for the help. I'm now getting comfortable at this and hopefully can create more to help with the standards compliance. 

jhallarsisatias_0-1743747463574.png

 

0 Likes