We are doing a project in 4 phases. The team is trying to show section bubbles that were cut in previous phases in a view that belongs to Phase 4 without the use of dummy tags.
I tried to filter section bubbles by Phase and Phase Filter - nothing changed. Then I tried to add a parameter to Sections - seems that is not possible.
Scratching my head here. Any clarity in this regard would be appreciated.
Gelöst! Gehe zur Lösung
Gelöst von RDAOU. Gehe zur Lösung
I would probably rename and duplicate section names based on phases rather than assigning section to phases and then filter them based on their name .. not neat one, but as Revit (still) doesnt have group filters it is a possible workaround ...
@Karol_Piroska - thank you! We are looking at 40-50 sections here - being able to filter them by name may not be viable.....
I meant renaming the section mark, not the view. This way you can control as many sections as you want. I use this for sections used for coordinations and have filters for these not to appear in certain views.
@Karol_Piroska - do you mean having differently named section marks? Section Phase 1, Section Phase 2, and so on?
yes. You just need to assign these new "types" to existing or new views and filter them.
Hi @Sahay_R
it's the standard/main disadvantage of phase specific tags in Revit. Similar to rooms; I would duplicate the view of the previous phase and filter out everything except the section bubbles then overlay them on the sheet on top of the other phase for a combined view with section bubbles from different phases ...
and dummies sometimes aren't that bad
they can be clever enough to reference other views
YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION
@Karol_Piroska is this what you are talking about?
1)
2)
PS - I changed Filter Rules over to Family and Type - still no luck
@RDAOU -thank you for another possibility to explore.
not sure that will work. I would duplicate entire section type, not the section head and use filter with "type contains phase1,2, ....".
Or maybe I didn't understand what you want to achieve.
That's what I have - separate types with separate families. However, the filter does not do what I want - which is to be able to see section tags from phases 1, 2, and 3 in Phase 4. Am I missing a step? Can you take a look at this mini file to see if I have missed anything?
The other possibility that I explored was to take the section tags and place them on Phase 4 - again unacceptable, since the tags will disappear from Phases 1, 2, and 3. Pulling my hair out here!
Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.