Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I was working on a small project in the newly released ReCap. When finished I decided to unify and export as RCS at 5mm spacing. First of all it took 3 hours to export (the project is only 6.5GB), second when I opened as a new project it had totally random coordinates.
I just saw this item you posted on a laserscanningforum.com thread and wanted to respond but have been waiting to get approved by the mods. I'm glad you posted it here.
Could you provdie a little more info about the coordinate system that was returned? What exactly do you mean by "random?"
Also, would it be possiblle for us to have a look at this data set to maybe get a better idea of what went wrong in the export process?
Thanks for the quick reply. How would you like me to give you the data set because it's obviously quite large?
When I say random I mean its coordinates have gone from roughly 530000,180000,30.000 to 4000,-8000,2.00. That's a pretty random grid shift in my book.
I have achieved my objective for the moment with this project by exporting as PTS (works fine and took about 5 mins), decimated in Cloud Compare and re-imported to a new project. I would still be useful to get to the bottom of it though as I can't be doing that with every job.
Interesting... I'll forward your comments to the team to see if they've encountered anything like this recently. I can't say I've seen the issue personally. I will PM you for details on getting the data to us.
I think there are fundamental bugs and errors in recap in processing Leica scans. My guess is that because Leica scan data are often thicker and contain a lot more points.
I'm also speculating Autodesk' lack of supprt on recap is coming from use of Faro scanner and they are unable to replicate same issue everyone in this forum is complaining.
I've come to this conclusion after testing out Bentleys Descartes v8i with same pts ptx ptg data. It got me even angrier because it was working flowlessly and the fact that I cant use Bentley softwares properly.
I am tired of paying Autodesk to beta test their products. using recap is a lost cause.
Just done an export of another project this morning (to RCP), and the same thing has happened. Didn't take 3 hours this time but again the new project has been shifted onto a different grid.
No worries, glad to hear it's working as you expect now. It's sometimes confusing to know what version you have since we release (and hotfix) multiple times in each product year. For example, we've now released 5 times since the first '2016' version. You can check the top of this forum, or your Application Manager install, at any time to determine if there's an update you're missing.
![Autodesk Design & Make Report](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1350519iCB55845EBFC43016/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" "Autodesk Design & Make Report")