sounds like a bug.
The nested block references are objects in
the definition of the mirrored block. When
a reference to that block is exploded, the
entities in its definition are deep cloned into
the space containing the reference that being
exploded. It's possible that the non-unform
scaling of the mirrored reference may have
something to do with it, but I don't see why
because AutoCAD doesn't place any grahical
meaning on XRecords.
You might try editing the mirrored reference
so it has a positive, uniform scale factor and
then explode that and see if the results are
the same.
--
http://www.caddzone.com
AcadXTabs: MDI Document Tabs for AutoCAD 2004/2005/2006/2007
http://www.acadxtabs.com
wrote in message news:5410859@discussion.autodesk.com...
nested blockreference
my application:
create the blockreference1 and 2
attach to blockreference1 and 2 somo xrecords
then the user of autocad (using only autocad, not my application):
make a new block with blockreference 1 and 2, and called this for example block3.
Now
if the user (always in autocad) copy and then explode block 3, the remaing block reference 1 and 2 have the xrecord attached.
if the user mirror (with autocad mirror command) block3 and then explode it, on blockreference block 1 and 2 the xrecord are not present,
why this?
thank you very much
