.NET
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Regarding Community Content Archiving

30 REPLIES 30
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 31
kerry_w_brown
30811 Views, 30 Replies

Regarding Community Content Archiving

Re: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/community-announcements/community-content-archiving-announcement-and-...

 

This thread is closed for comment, so I'm posting here.
The title says archiving but the posts indicate >>> Unfortunately, we cannot keep the content  , which in my book  is DELETING.

 

I'm only interested in code groups but these comments also apply to the regular customising and operational Forums,

 

Deleting everything that was originated prior to 10 years ago will destroy a wealth of information that is still viable. This information has not been transferred to the "Help" files and will no longer be searchable, the bookmarked links (published and personal) will no longer be available and the peers who provided this information probably won't be available ( or not inclined ) to reproduce the information when it is required.

These groups are peer to peer and the answers to peoples questions and solutions to problems is typically provided by users of the products, not by the builders of the products.  I consider this action to be an insult to the efforts of the people who have, at their own expense, graciously helped other users over the years.
If those individuals are still around, I thank you for your efforts and generosity.

I sure hope AutoDesk are not relying on AI to provide the information currently being destroyed.

The expression "Going to hell in a handbasket" comes to mind.

 

 


// Called Kerry in my other life.

Everything will work just as you expect it to, unless your expectations are incorrect.
Sometimes the question is more important than the answer.

class keyThumper<T> : Lazy<T>;      another  Swamper

30 REPLIES 30
Message 21 of 31
BlackBox_
in reply to: kerry_w_brown

History will be kind to me for I intend to [delete everything I don't want and re-]write it.” ~ Autodesk's distortion of Sir Winston Churchill



"How we think determines what we do, and what we do determines what we get."

Message 22 of 31
norman.yuan
in reply to: kerry_w_brown

I can hardly think it is simply out of someone's stupidity. It might be that Autodesk is to move away from the desktop CAD apps gradually and does not want to gather more interests to its desktop AutoCAD as it has been so far. Anyone who spent time to adopt AutoCAD APIs in their AutoCAD use knows how much Autodesk lacks of documentation support, especially with its latest API - .NET API. For most .NET API developer, online peer-to-peer support is almost the only way someone could get really useful/serious help, and I am sure Autodesk is aware of it. So, destroying it because of someone being stupid? No, I do not think so. 

Norman Yuan

Drive CAD With Code

EESignature

Message 23 of 31

Hi,

 

>> It might be that Autodesk is to move away from the desktop CAD apps gradually

>> and does not want to gather more interests to its desktop AutoCAD

Well, nothing is impossible.

But: if you are right with your thoughts, then they don't just lose forum users, the also lose licenses/buying customers (step 1 started with licensing change and now big step 2, again pushing customers to competitors). If your thoughts are correct, then wow, but I'm hoping that is not true.

 

- alfred -

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alfred NESWADBA
ISH-Solutions GmbH / Ingenieur Studio HOLLAUS
www.ish-solutions.at ... blog.ish-solutions.at ... LinkedIn ... CDay 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(not an Autodesk consultant)
Message 24 of 31


@DiningPhilosopher wrote:

Just so everyone knows (and doesn't bother wasting their time trying to find them), all of the posts that I made under this account have been deleted. Most of those posts are as relevant today as they were the day they were posted.

 

 


Yes Tony, Ive come across a couple links from elsewhere to threads here that no longer exist.

//  - - - - - 

 

Perhaps someone from Autodesk will deign to explain this shift to us one day, if we're still around.

 

 

 

 

 

 


// Called Kerry in my other life.

Everything will work just as you expect it to, unless your expectations are incorrect.
Sometimes the question is more important than the answer.

class keyThumper<T> : Lazy<T>;      another  Swamper

Message 25 of 31
CADbloke
in reply to: kerry_w_brown

Just when I thought my disdain for Autodesk had reached capacity. Sigh. They get nothing more from me. I still use it but they will get no more good will from me. 

- - - - - - -
working on all sorts of things including www.tvCAD.tv & www.CADreplace.com
Message 26 of 31

@CADbloke,

Hi Ewan,

I'm not suggesting we engage a witch to cast spells. What's been done is an embuggerance, but not earth shattering.

New coders may suffer a bit ; I s'pose that depends on how the data is "repurposed".
Links to useful posts are dead, but we've seen that before and survived :slightly_smiling_face:

I really can't throw stones 'cause I've done some stupid things myself over the years.

 

Stay well,

 

 


// Called Kerry in my other life.

Everything will work just as you expect it to, unless your expectations are incorrect.
Sometimes the question is more important than the answer.

class keyThumper<T> : Lazy<T>;      another  Swamper

Message 27 of 31


@norman.yuan wrote:

I can hardly think it is simply out of someone's stupidity. It might be that Autodesk is to move away from the desktop CAD apps gradually and does not want to gather more interests to its desktop AutoCAD as it has been so far. Anyone who spent time to adopt AutoCAD APIs in their AutoCAD use knows how much Autodesk lacks of documentation support, especially with its latest API - .NET API. For most .NET API developer, online peer-to-peer support is almost the only way someone could get really useful/serious help, and I am sure Autodesk is aware of it. So, destroying it because of someone being stupid? No, I do not think so. 


As with most unpopular actions taken by Autodesk, there is almost always an underlying, undisclosed purpose.

Message 28 of 31

It didn't take very long for an example to surface showing how Autodesk took this action with complete understanding of its implications:

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net/synchronize-call-commands-in-autocad-versions-before-2015/td-p/13...

 

Not supporting older product releases is one thing. Actions that are taken with the understanding that those actions will deny users of those product versions the benefit of peer support is something else entirely.

 

Unsurprisingly, disappointment is not in short supply.

 

PS: Perplexity.AI is proving to be a real Google-killer.

 

Happy New Year

Message 29 of 31
soonhui
in reply to: ActivistInvestor

Hi @ActivistInvestor , which github forums that you post to, and which github forums have the potential to replace the official forums here.

 

I also want to migrate for the same reason. 

##########

Ngu Soon Hui

##########

I'm the Benevolent Dictator for Life for MiTS Software.

Read more at here

Message 30 of 31
ActivistInvestor
in reply to: soonhui

GitHub is not a replacement for a discussion group like this. You can visit theswamp.org, which is an alternative discussion forum

Message 31 of 31
MegaJerk
in reply to: kerry_w_brown

I haven't regularly posted on these forums since around 2016, but still regularly get email notifications from threads I started or helped to solve because somebody in the present saw some value in it and gave a post a like. And while I cannot say with absolute certainty how much those new users were helped with something from so long ago, it's a **** shame to see such a seemingly valuable resource get thrown into the fire for the sake of a completely opaque corporate decision. Decisions like this one, especially when the reasons seem embarrassingly untrue (at least for a billion dollar company who could, if they wanted, buy a stack of hard drives that would rival the tallest building in height), are not only self-serving but also signal to anyone paying any attention that this place can no longer be trusted with their investment of knowledge and time.

 

A community space that can't be trusted to retain useful data, or that can't be trusted to not change the URIs to that data (see: Cool URIs don't change) is, in my opinion, not a space worth supporting. I do not know why Autodesk sought to devalue the contributions of its community, but the reasons will never really matter all that much. In my experience (regarding product forums getting destroyed slowly), if it has happened once, it’s likely to happen again.

 

I hope that your community efforts to start elsewhere succeed and are supported by everyone here who doesn’t like what has happened. The knowledge shared in this place was invaluable to me when I was getting started with Inventor so long ago, and I hope that you all can carry that same energy and know-how to a more stable platform.

PS: Going through my post history it really is crazy just how many detailed posts are now up and missing. Such a waste.



If my solution worked or helped you out, please don't forget to hit the kudos button :slightly_smiling_face:
iLogicCode Injector: goo.gl/uTT1IB

GitHub

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

AutoCAD Inside the Factory


Autodesk Design & Make Report