Inventor Nastran Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’sInventor Nastran Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor Nastran topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Simplify Bearing for analysis

8 REPLIES 8
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 9
Max.H.Pour
1947 Views, 8 Replies

Simplify Bearing for analysis

Hi,

 

I am trying to simplify a pair of tapered roller bearings for analysis. The reason I am doing this is Nastran In-CAD cannot mesh the bearings or at-least I don't know hoe to do it.

 

Any thoughts? 

 

Thanks!

Regards,
Max H.
8 REPLIES 8
Message 2 of 9
shigeaki.k
in reply to: Max.H.Pour

Hello @maxhDL7VT,

 

are you able to give a bit mode information e.g. are you looking at modelling the loading between the bearing and the shaft? 

 

Incidentally, in Nastran In-CAD there is a "bearing Load" type load that represents the typical compressive load distribution that occurs in contact areas between shafts and bearings or bushings.

 

You can find more information here.

Fig1.png

 

 

Regards,

Kino****a S.

 

-----------------

If my post answers your question, please click the "Accept as Solution" button. This helps everyone find answers more quickly!

 



Shigeaki K.

Technical Support Specialist

サポートとラーニング | Support & Learning
Message 3 of 9
Max.H.Pour
in reply to: shigeaki.k

Hi shigeaki.k,

 

Thanks for the reply. Actually I am trying to simulate a model of Wheel, shaft and 2 tapered roller bearings. The issue is that Nastran is not able to create a mesh model for the 2 bearings and keep sending the Meshing failure message. I tried to simplify the bearings original DWG but still this gives you less accurate results.

 

Thanks 

Regards,
Max H.
Message 4 of 9
shigeaki.k
in reply to: Max.H.Pour

Hi @Max.H.Pour,

 

are you able to post some screenshots, as well as posting what the error is? What setting(s) are you using for the mesh?

 

Regards,

Shigeaki K.



Shigeaki K.

Technical Support Specialist

サポートとラーニング | Support & Learning
Message 5 of 9
Max.H.Pour
in reply to: shigeaki.k

Good day shigeaki.k

 

Please have a look at screenshots. Well, I tried to get rid of Fillets and still getting this error message.

 

I am using the default setting for the mesh only refining the mesh size to 5 mm or less for the areas of interest.

 

1.PNG2.PNG3.PNG4.PNG

Regards,
Max H.
Message 6 of 9
shigeaki.k
in reply to: Max.H.Pour

Hello @Max.H.Pour,

 

thank you for the screenshots. I can see that you have tried to individually mesh the bearing. Could you tell me if the bearing is a single part i.e. from a third party in a neutral file format?

 

 

For example, I use Inventor and with a non-Inventor file format, I had to convert the single part to an assembly of parts so meshing could be done more easily. 

 

Fig1.png

 

You could also play around with the mesh settings. In most cases, I only change the element size, "Refinement Ratio" or "Max Element Growth Rate" or combination of them. I don't tend to touch the other parameters. You can find more information on the meshing parameters here

 

With Regards,

Shigeaki K.

 

-----------------

If my post answers your question, please click the "Accept as Solution" button. This helps everyone find answers more quickly!



Shigeaki K.

Technical Support Specialist

サポートとラーニング | Support & Learning
Message 7 of 9
Max.H.Pour
in reply to: shigeaki.k

Hello shigeaki.k,

 

Thanks for the reply. The bearings come from our vault library(content center) as an Inventor file format and I have assembled them within Inventor environment If this is what you were asking?

 

I can see in the screenshot the bearing is successfully meshed. Can you please tell me what settings have you used?

 

Thanks

Regards,
Max H.
Message 8 of 9
John_Holtz
in reply to: Max.H.Pour

Hi maxhDL7VT,

 

I am curious: what is the purpose of including the bearings in your analysis? Are you designing the bearings? Are you trying to include the stress or displacement in the bearings in your analysis?

 

Normally, the bearings are viewed as constraining the model. So instead of trying to model the bearings as physical parts, maybe it is possible to use some type of constraint that give the same behavior as the bearings. This would give you the stress and displacement in the rest of the model.

 

Even if the bearing were between two parts of the model, such as connecting the shaft to the housing, I would model the bearing as two solid rings that meet at the center of the rollers, with some type of contact where the rollers would be located. This would be simpler to mesh, and instead of having contact between N rollers and two races, there would only be contact between the mating faces of the races.



John Holtz, P.E.

Global Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.


If not provided already, be sure to indicate the version of Inventor Nastran you are using!

"The knowledge you seek is at knowledge.autodesk.com" - Confucius 😉
Message 9 of 9
Max.H.Pour
in reply to: John_Holtz

Hi John,

 

I would like know which model is more accurate since I am getting different results from so many different simulations I have been running. This concerns me a bit to be completely honest.

 

In my model as well, the bearings are fixed constraints and loads are applied to specific areas on wheel surface. I edited the bearings original sketch to -as you mentioned- a ring and this is much simpler to mesh.

 

Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Max H.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report