Well...I not work on studios. Hopefully I work in freelance mode. And the studios are who come to me asking for artworks. No matter If I use Mudbox, Zbrush,, 3DS MAX, Blender or Paint. They only want the requested artwrok.And the other problem here is that always the Zbrush users thinks that the rigth way to do things is "Zbrush mode".Blender have an very nice new sculpting settings with his Dyntopo, and now, the soft dont crash when you reach hi polycounts like in the past. And now have and very nice Real time render system too. But nobody pay attention to that. No. Instead, the Zbrush fans continue with the insistence that the Blender user should to change to Zbrush.This is like the actual debate beetween the users that prefer the GPU render and the other ones that prefer the CPU render.But the true, is that already Mudbox is present in the industry. And he is not as praised as Zbrush, when Mud form part of the workflow in a movie like Rogue One,(Marco di Lucca on ILM uses Mudbox for much part of his workflow and used it for the Moff Tarkin likeness digital double). But obviously. Not is Zbrush. Nobody cares.I consider that if Mudbox finally count with the Dinamic Tessellation of Meshmixer and the Booleans, those 2 things added to the retopo and the easy and intuitive UI, Mudbox could be again again an more interesting tool in the industry. Obviously, there are a lot of things could me added and enhanced, but why complicate things uselessly? Like the other user here said before: Who really use all the enormous collection of tools in Z? For the tasks I do for clients working remotely: I need to pay for an huge soft like Z? There are complementary 3D softs to help my work with mudbox, that are free,(I use meshmixer in conjunction because my main work is for the 3D printing industry, for collectible sculpts, and wthe 2 soft works very fine for me).
Greetings:Sergio Mengual3D Artist-3D Generalist-3D Character Artist
https://www.artstation.com/artist/sergiomengualhttps://www.facebook.com/Sergio3D2D/
