Announcements

Community notifications may experience intermittent interruptions between 10–12 November during scheduled maintenance. We appreciate your patience.

Moldflow 2024 is live!

Moldflow 2024 is live!

raalteh
Community Manager Community Manager
1,963 Views
4 Replies
Message 1 of 5

Moldflow 2024 is live!

raalteh
Community Manager
Community Manager

Dear Moldflow User Community,

 

Moldflow starts the year strong with the announcement of Moldflow 2024 FCS!

raalteh_0-1706039010163.png

 

Without discussing everything in this release in detail here, I want to call out a few things that I believe are going to be impactful for many users:

  • Installation made easier. When downloading the software from Autodesk Accounts, you can now configure you license choices before downloading the software. You can indicate you will be running with a Named User license or a Network license (and specify where the license manager is hosted). The Moldflow license configuration tool (MLC.exe) is still available in case you need to change the license type after the initial installation. Deployments are now also supported. We recommend you to use the new custom install options for the installation. Please see use the easy-to-follow instructions (here).
  • We have two new result plot options for 3D models to help make sense of 3D data*:
    • A new ‘Show Min/Max’ option identifies the minimum and maximum value of a result as well as the locations of these values. Time based animations are also supported (with exception of ‘Fill time’ which is a different type of result).
    • A new Histogram option shows the distribution of 3D result values. You can now immediately see if the maximum or minimum values are common or outlier values (and can maybe be ignored). You can control customize the distribution of values and if you click on one bar, you will see where the values in that range are located. These can also be animated over time (again except for ‘Fill time’ because this is a different type of result).
  • New solver capabilities:
    • The new Assembly Analysis capability can show you what the ‘as molded’ part will look like when mounted into an assembly (as molded and as assembled).
    • Options in the 3D flow solver to fully couple fiber orientation and the flow solver trough viscosity effects and thermal conductivity effects.
  • Accuracy improvements:
    • The new STAMP option** to significantly improve the predictive accuracy for 3D models, calculated with materials that have measured shrinkage data (STAMP = Shrinkage Tested Adjusted Material Properties). This does for 3D models, what CRIMS does for Midplane and Dual Domain. STAMP is the result of a 3-year development from a large team, and Autodesk applied for a patent.

For a detailed view of what's new in Moldflow 2024, please read the 'What's new in 2024' section in the help (here). 

 

Validation documents can be found here:

Moldflow communicator is available from the Communicator page (here). The updated Material data fitting tools can be downloaded from here.

 

For the Moldflow Scandium Technology preview users, the Scandium .dat files have been updated and are available on the feedback portal. Existing Scandium users can login to the feedback portal (here). People interested in joining project Scandium you can apply here.

 

The Moldflow 2024 is the most significant release of the last 10 years, with the usability improvements as accuracy improvements. I’m very proud of the release and am confident you will enjoy working with Moldflow 2024.

 

Best regards,

 

Hanno van Raalte, on behalf of the Autodesk Moldflow development team.

 

* Min/Max and Histogram plots are disabled for different plots (e.g. air trap where this does not make sense) as well as certain use cases (e.g. warpage with anchor planes active).

** STAMP is set as the non-default option, to give us time to collect customer feedback. We expect this to give significant improvement over the Residual Stress model for the vast majority of cases.  

 

 

Hanno van Raalte,

Product Manager - Injection Molding & Moldflow products
1,964 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)
Message 2 of 5

ReinerStoppa4372
Participant
Participant

You need to reselect material when reusing older studies and run a complete Simulation when you switch STAMP on. Else 

Shrinkage test adjusted mechanical properties (STAMP) are used in residual stress calculation.

 

** ERROR 202199 ** Material data required for the STAMP shrinkage model is not present in the study file.

                   Select the material again to update the study and run the analysis again.

Message 3 of 5

raalteh
Community Manager
Community Manager

Correct! I have this included in my 'what's new slides'

Hanno van Raalte,

Product Manager - Injection Molding & Moldflow products
0 Likes
Message 4 of 5

blazej_paluszynski
Explorer
Explorer

There is significant difference in shrinkage and warpage results between 2023 and 2024, when using default “Uncorrected residual stress” model for 3D mesh and GF reinforced materials.

I spent few days looking for a “bug” until I found out from Franco Costa’s presentation during Summit 2024 that this is a “feature”. The validation report above was also helpful.

However, considering the fact that “Uncorrected residual stress” model is still the default for 3D mesh and that out of nearly 3500 GF reinforced materials in databank around half doesn’t have CRIMS data, I think there should be clearer information about this in the release notes. Currently there is very vague information, which refers only to LCP:


Clipboard18.jpg

0 Likes
Message 5 of 5

raalteh
Community Manager
Community Manager
Thank you Blazej for raising this. I'm sorry you lost time investigating.
We agree that the validation reports are very important and we try to release them together with the software.
I suppose the validation reports may not always be easy to find. Something I'll try to think about is if we can provide a few different access points for them, to make them easier to find.
Strictly speaking help is correct, but the 99%-use case is related to LCP. Maybe this should have been boldened then to emphasize this.

Regarding the documentation itself; we have to balance over documentation (more information and detail than you need) and insufficient documentation/detail. We will never get that balance right I think, we have people wanting to know different things.
That said, thinking out of the box, there may be a role for ChatGPT-type of applications here at some point: "I see X, is there anything in the new release that can explain this".

Again.. thank you for reporting, sorry for your loss of time ae we will try to improve.
Hanno van Raalte,

Product Manager - Injection Molding & Moldflow products
0 Likes