- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Friends
I had some diffculty simplifying my 3D cooling channel mesh. when meshing the cad file (with parasolid format) that contained 3D cooling channel, I ended with very small meshes around the bends, quite unneccessary for my analysis. (I got these very small elements I think because there were many surfaces stiched together in the CAD file). for cooling channel, I got 1.5 milion elements by meshing the cad file.
to get around that problem I did the following
- exported my cad file as STL file
- made a new study and imported STL file as the work part
- 3D-meshed the part in mold flow (smooth mesh much better than previous)
- exported the study file as patran file
- opened the project that I was working on
- imported the patran file and assigned 3D channel to it
with patran file, the mesh has 800k elements. half the elements i got before. now that I am making 3D mold mesh, I get a nice clean triangles for the internal surface of the mold, BUT in the mesh log it says:
Mesh with the following settings:
External mold surface edge length: 2.0000 in
Internal mold surface edge length: 0.2000 in
Target number of nodes on circumferences of cylinders: 15
Warning: No cooling channels found.
Generating mold surface mesh
Percent 20 done ....
Percent 40 done ....
Percent 60 done ....
Total number of nodes: 96730 triangles: 193452
Surface aspect ratio: Maximum = 41.0215 average = 2.6852
Percent 100 done ....
A mold surface mesh has been created. Please check the mesh.
A 3D mold mesh can be generated by double-clicking Create 3D Mold Mesh again.
why is that? does cooling channle has to be imported as cad file and be meshed directly by moldflow in the same study?
how does 3D meshing of the cooling channle differ from 3D meshing of the part, mathematically speaking?
Solved! Go to Solution.