Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I've had some reports from the BG artists in my company that Maya's sculpting tools are really heavy and unstable, making Maya crash, making it really difficult to use. Is this a common problem with a lot of people?
2. PolyDamage
I see! I will investigate this through the procedural textures, thank you for the advice. Also, as an alternative, I will try making some simple MEL coding to cover this to some point.
"I've had some reports from the BG artists in my company that Maya's sculpting tools are really heavy and unstable, making Maya crash, making it really difficult to use. Is this a common problem with a lot of people?"
I can't confirm this. There have been some bugs in previous releases for some of the brushes, but i did not hear of any problems for some time.
Mudbox as being a dedicated application will of course be a better choice.
2. Not sure what you want to do with MEL here, it's just a simple material network that's needed.
By using MEL, I meant actually "damaging" objects in the modeling phase, but instead of doing this manually, make it automatically generate a randomly damaged version of the object itself. Should this be avoided?
If you want the damage to be modeled in the mesh you can do this and regardless of the solution you choose you can also create a script for an automated processing, there is nothing wrong with this.
