Hi,
I just noticed that the thin wall model L/D ratio is substantially different between Inventor Stress Analysis and Nastran. I don't understand what's going on behind the scenes enough to know why this is the case.
Simple question- Are these ratios the correct assumption to make when working in each analysis?
Nastran-
Stress analysis-
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi,
I just noticed that the thin wall model L/D ratio is substantially different between Inventor Stress Analysis and Nastran. I don't understand what's going on behind the scenes enough to know why this is the case.
Simple question- Are these ratios the correct assumption to make when working in each analysis?
Nastran-
Stress analysis-
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by John_Holtz. Go to Solution.
Hi @will_roe
The 100/1 L/D ratio (Inventor Stress Analysis, ISA) seems very large to me. Personally, I would not use a solid mesh when the L/D ratio is close to that large. But ISA does have higher order elements (high order than parabolic in Inventor Nastran), so perhaps it can compensate for such thin parts.
I suspect the 20/1 L/D ratio (Inventor Nastran) is based on the engineering approximation of thin-wall cylinders versus thick-wall cylinders.
Hi @will_roe
The 100/1 L/D ratio (Inventor Stress Analysis, ISA) seems very large to me. Personally, I would not use a solid mesh when the L/D ratio is close to that large. But ISA does have higher order elements (high order than parabolic in Inventor Nastran), so perhaps it can compensate for such thin parts.
I suspect the 20/1 L/D ratio (Inventor Nastran) is based on the engineering approximation of thin-wall cylinders versus thick-wall cylinders.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.