Shrink Fit analysis on quarter model to full model is not matching

Shrink Fit analysis on quarter model to full model is not matching

YAlbay
Contributor Contributor
112 Views
0 Replies
Message 1 of 1

Shrink Fit analysis on quarter model to full model is not matching

YAlbay
Contributor
Contributor

I am performing a nonlinear shrink fit (press fit) analysis in Autodesk Nastran and am seeing a significant discrepancy between a quarter-symmetry model and a full 3D model.

My geometry is a steel cylindrical block with a hole of ~1in depth. I have a carbide sleeve that is press fitted into the hole with a max dia interference of 0.003" (0.0015" radial). 

YAlbay_1-1776796810656.png

 

Hand calculations estimate about 10.5ksi contact pressure with 0.0011" of sleeve ID displacement.

 

I ran a quarter model with symmetry and a full model with about the same setup except for the symmetry constraint.

 

Quarter Model (with symmetry):

  • 1/4 model using symmetry boundary conditions
  • Bottom of cylindrical block is fixed
  • Surface contact between mating cylindrical surfaces
  • Contact face mesh of 0.01" (need it to be scalable to an even bigger model)
  • Shrink Fit/Sliding
  • Friction 0.5
  • Contact stiffness = 1
  • Max allowable penetration = 0.0001"
  • Max Activation Distance 1.2 x contact face mesh
  • ~10 load increments

Result:

  • Contact pressure ~14ksi and max displacement 0.0012"

Full Model (same setup, no symmetry):

  • Same contact definition and parameters
  • Only bottom of cylindrical block is fixed
  • No constraints on inner sleeve

Result:

  • Contact pressure ~100-400psi psi and max displacement ~0.0012-0.0018"

I suspect the symmetry constraint helped with getting close to analytical values. I have tried the following with the full model with no luck:

  • adding/removing other contacts (ie. bottom of sleeve separation)
  • rigid connector to restrict sleeve rotation

None of these worked.


I'm hoping someone can help me answer these questions:

  1. Why would a quarter-symmetry model produce close to theoretical contact force/pressure results while the full model (with identical settings) produces extremely low contact force? I suspect the symmetry constraint difference is behind this.
  2. How could I replicate the model stability from the quarter model to the full model?
  3. If displacement appears to be reasonable, can displacement results be considered reliable even when contact force/pressure results are not? What does the calculation chain look like for Shrink fit analyses in Nastran? Does it do calculate displacement -> force -> pressure?

Any input is welcome and appreciated!

 

 

0 Likes
113 Views
0 Replies
Replies (0)