cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Support structured general manufacturing requirements as 3D PMI in Inventor IPT/IAM files

Support structured general manufacturing requirements as 3D PMI in Inventor IPT/IAM files

Problem statement:

Inventor currently does not provide a structured PMI representation for general manufacturing requirements that apply to a part, including:

  • General tolerances for unspecified dimensions, e.g. DIN ISO 2768-cL
  • Edge treatment requirements, e.g. DIN ISO 13715
  • General surface finish requirements, e.g. Ra 6.3, no material removal

Today, these requirements can only be represented as general notes in the Inventor model. While this makes the information human-readable, it does not provide a semantically structured representation that can reliably be consumed by downstream manufacturing systems.

 

Requested capability:
Ability to define these general manufacturing requirements as structured, machine-readable PMI directly within an Inventor IPT/IAM model. The information should be accessible through Inventor's PMI/MBD data model and available to downstream applications and interfaces, rather than being represented only as free-text annotations.

 

Expected workflow:
Inventor IPT/IAM → structured PMI/MBD → downstream manufacturing application (e.g. Fusion CAM) → automated interpretation during manufacturing preparation.

 

Business value:
A more complete model-based definition and manufacturing workflow. It would reduce manual interpretation and transfer of manufacturing requirements, improve data consistency, reduce manufacturing preparation errors, and support an end-to-end digital thread from engineering to manufacturing.

 

Key requirement:
The important aspect is not simply displaying these requirements in the 3D model. They need to be represented semantically/structurally so that downstream software can identify the type of requirement and its value programmatically.

2 Comments
stkuehne
Autodesk

Hello Inventor Team, that is a huge issue for the customer. If it were implemented, it would be a major benefit for other companies that operate in accordance with ISO standards as well. BR Stefan Kuehne (TAM for this customer)

niranjansenthilkumar397
Community Visitor

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STRUCTURED MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ General Tolerance │
│ Standard: [ DIN ISO 2768 ▼ ] │
│ Class: [ cL ▼ ] │
│ │
│ Edge Treatment │
│ Standard: [ DIN ISO 13715 ▼ ] │
│ Requirement: [ General ▼ ] │
│ │
│ Surface Finish │
│ Parameter: [ Ra ▼ ] │
│ Value: [ 6.3 ] │
│ Unit: [ µm ▼ ] │
│ Material Removal: [ Prohibited ▼ ] │
│ │
│ [Add Requirement] [Edit] [Delete] │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea