cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

iFeature - Improve Support for Shared Fabrication Features Across Multiple Parts

iFeature - Improve Support for Shared Fabrication Features Across Multiple Parts

Description: In manufacturing highly configurable products like windows and doors, many components share identical fabrication features (e.g., handle holes, endcuts, strike plate cutouts). Today, Inventor’s iFeature workflow allows us to standardize these features, but once an iFeature is placed in a part, it becomes static — there’s no persistent link to the source definition. This makes it difficult to propagate design changes across dozens or hundreds of affected parts.

We’ve explored derived part workflows to maintain a single source of truth, but these introduce complexity when parts vary in size or geometry, and require extra setup to position features dynamically. What’s missing is a way to manage shared features with:

  • Live linking to a master definition (like a “referenced iFeature”) so updates can cascade to all parts using it

  • Parameter mapping so the same feature can adapt to different part sizes or configurations

  • Integration with BOM and phantom assemblies so shared processes can be represented cleanly in ERP exports without duplicating documentation

Why it matters: For companies like ours, this gap forces us into time‑consuming, error‑prone workarounds that break the connection between design intent, manufacturing documentation, and ERP data. A shared‑feature system would save hours of rework, reduce mistakes, and make Inventor a robust solution for BOM‑driven highly configurable manufacturing.

5 Comments
pbsorba
Explorer

Sometimes the definition of a iFeature can change. It would be great if there is an option to update the iFeatures in a part (a reload). Can this also be a new function in iLogic?

 

Maybe Inventor can save the file date of an iFeature and compare it with the date found on the file location when opening a part. When this is newer it would be nice to get a warning.

Tags (3)
DSantos23
Enthusiast

This is one of the major gaps in Inventor today on an enterprise / standardization driven environment. It's what separate the boys from men when it comes to CAD software.

I wish Autodesk had more resources looking/addressing into this.

LELO_NTI
Contributor

The iFeature feature should be overhauled. It has been the same for 15 years.

J_Pfeifer_
Advocate

They have created a second product to solve these problems. Completely ignoring the issue on Inventor's side. They've got some licenses to sell you. 

ewu9
Enthusiast

Yes, this would be super helpful.
Even if we could just replace an iFeature with a similar one that takes the same parameters would be super. (similar to component.replace() in an assembly)

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea