Users want more flexibility in configuring item number content. 1. It should be possible to display multiple properties for all item number styles. Currently, this is only possible in two predefined styles. 2. There should be a configuration option to specify whether the properties should be displayed one below the other (currently the default) or one after the other (a future preference). 3. Configuration options in the item number text should be similar to the options in the annotations.     for additional information see Support Case 24562710 Show More

Unify Pattern panel – all features for parts also for assemblies Show More

When a part is constrained by origin planes or origin axes, it would be logical that when i replace this part with an assembly,the assembly finds the same constraints.     Show More

Linking parameters between assemblies, parts and sketches can be improved. Currently when linking parameters you need to open the parameter list, select link, add the desired file name, go find the parameter, select ok and only then you can link a dimension to a parameter. I propose that all of this can happen in the background. New workflow, edit dimension and then select dimension in other part. At this point the parameter gets added to the parameter list.    Your click can change the future - Vote now!   Proposed Workflow:   Current workflow:           Show More

Please add this feature in Insert constraint too!     Show More

Please add the possibility to stretch the ‘component pattern’ editing window to enlarge it. This will improve the workflow. Show More

Idea: Add the ability to apply a weld prep (chamfer) to a part file from within the Weldment (assembly) environment or in Frame Generator instead of it being at the assembly level.     Reason:  At the moment, it is only possible to create a weld prep feature at the assembly level in a weldment or frame generator. In an assembly company it is sometimes more efficient to have the sub-supplier add the weld preps to a part before delivery so that the welder doesn't need to prep the parts.   This means adding the preps to the part drawing - rather than on a welded assembly drawing, which means the chamfer needs to be in the part document instead of the assembly.   This is also better when re-using parts, as the prep is applied to all parts with one instruction and only needs fixing in one place if it goes wrong when making changes.   Currently, this is achieved by opening the part file and making the change there, potentially losing the prep when a frame is altered and having to add it back in.   It would be better and faster if this could be an "assembly driven" feature in the weldment or frame generator environment, that applied to the part file when working with the frame generator or with weldments.   Option 1: In a Weldment, click Preparation, then apply a Chamfer feature. or In a frame generator session, click a new Chamfer option:   Select the "Apply to Part File" option to make this a part-level feature, rather than an assembly level feature. Show More

It would be nice to be able to Open Drawing or Open Drawing from Vault by right clicking on a line item in a BOM of a drawing. Show More

Hi Inventor developer team, Please add the possibility to select specific lines when inserting a Leader Text by copy and past If you place a new Leader Text a menu for selecting e.g., different lines of nearby parts pop up after a few seconds. But if you copy and past an existing Leader Text there does not pop up this possibility to select a special line of a part. If in the Leader Text are properties included e.g., for “Title” it is now not possible to select this for the different parts. Please implement the possibility to select specific lines of different parts when copy and past an existing Leader Text as it is possible by setting a new Leader Text.   Show More

I'm going to say that this idea is actually an amalgamation of a lot of others )(Examples ), but ever since Inventor added the the little button for selecting the axis into the pattern tool, I'm wanting that button EVERYWHERE.    This was a great idea:   Here's some other locations where it could go; and I'm sure there's many more.   In the 'Move Body - Along Ray' command:   In the 'Revolution' command: (two-options and in dark-mode)   Show More

Hi, i would like to have an option / possibility to choose a view depth for each part in an assembly separatly in a section view. This will be very useful for us. We have very details models, so in a section view with th hole view depth (depth = full) we see too much. But for some parts it is necessary to see them in the whole depth (detph = full) and other parts only in the section plane (depth = 0).      Show More

When the program opens the Open dialog box, there's a File Name section at the bottom where you can manually enter the file name. When you enter a file name, it appears below the names of files that begin with that file name. However, the name of the file you manually entered needs to be the exact same. Sometimes it's impossible to remember. It would be nice to make this section a bit more tolerant. For example, when you enter a file name, it would display not only the characters that begin with it, but also any characters that appear at the beginning, middle, or end of the file name. For example, if I were to search for the file G20-0009-1564-GA.ipt, I think it would be perfect if I typed 09-156 and the file name would appear there. Show More

When producing orientation drawing for tanks etc it gets messy very quickly using conventional angular dimensions. That's why there is a need for angular ordinate dimensions currently I do this using the ordinate dimension then over riding the value then importing the parameter needed so its linked but this is time consuming. Please add   Original Author: Ben-Cornelius   Show More

I miss the function in the assembly tree that automatically groups identical components (screws, etc.)—this makes the assembly tree much clearer. Show More

Users and companies would like the possibility to sync the whole Inventor default templates with Vault. (i.e. Backgrounds, Macros, Textures, etc.) Not just only the "Design Data" and "Templates" folders. As a company it would be easier that way to keep all users default templates in sync company-wide. For example, Macros get improved all the time. Show More

Hello,  In the view tab, we have today the command "Display separate colors" For ... (each part, each unique part, each top level component, each unique top level component). I would be great to have another filter "For each material" to be able to view all the parts with the same material or to check that the right material are applied on the assembly.   Show More

Improve word wrapping in part lists and every other kind of tables available inside Inventor by adding a check box to enable word wrap by columns instead of only affecting the headers. Maybe have the column width grey out if the box is checked. It would be nice to be able to select each columns individually but I could live with a global option, anything would be better than the way it is currently. The way it's been done previously feels very half-baked tbh   Show More

It would be nice to have a Find and Replace tool that would allow us to look for text values in the active file type.   Drawing file - search iProperties, Note text, View Label text, Dimension text, Table text, etc. Assembly files - search iProperties, Sketch text, Browser text, etc. Part files - search iProperties, Sketch text, Browser text, etc. Original Author: Curtis_Waguespack Show More

Description: In manufacturing highly configurable products like windows and doors, many components share identical fabrication features (e.g., handle holes, endcuts, strike plate cutouts). Today, Inventor’s iFeature workflow allows us to standardize these features, but once an iFeature is placed in a part, it becomes static — there’s no persistent link to the source definition. This makes it difficult to propagate design changes across dozens or hundreds of affected parts. We’ve explored derived part workflows to maintain a single source of truth, but these introduce complexity when parts vary in size or geometry, and require extra setup to position features dynamically. What’s missing is a way to manage shared features with: Live linking to a master definition (like a “referenced iFeature”) so updates can cascade to all parts using it Parameter mapping so the same feature can adapt to different part sizes or configurations Integration with BOM and phantom assemblies so shared processes can be represented cleanly in ERP exports without duplicating documentation Why it matters: For companies like ours, this gap forces us into time‑consuming, error‑prone workarounds that break the connection between design intent, manufacturing documentation, and ERP data. A shared‑feature system would save hours of rework, reduce mistakes, and make Inventor a robust solution for BOM‑driven highly configurable manufacturing. Show More