@drawingsCHR7R wrote:
Thanks for the tip, I tried it but unfortunately for some reason it isn't working.
You will see the effects of the row merge setting in the Structured BOM (second tab).
The first tab is just the model data, and will reflect the real filesystem situation of your design.
@drawingsCHR7R wrote:
Would I need to change the name of the part using design assistant perhaps?
No: row merge primary key is the part number, so the suggestion from Christopher is right.
There is also a nice idea from my AU mentor to vote to improve the Inventor functionality in this area:
Besides this I would really suggest you to avoid scenarios where different files have the same filename, even if inventor can still handle it (it's a very brittle situation, believe me 😁).
@drawingsCHR7R wrote:
Of course I could, what I want to do is just see how I can speed up workflow and by using mirror command it saves me a bit of time.
You have for sure valid reasons for leveraging one workflow instead of another. I personally would suggest you to try to pursue the "reuse" strategy: a little bit more time at the beginning, but better design management and lower design complexity afterwards. Scaling the "mirroring" strategy for larger assemblies, would imply to have many different files which are actually describing the same geometry (your gusset in this case): those files must be handled on the filesystem (hence in the PDM system if you have it) and they need to be loaded by Inventor. But it's your choice.
I've attached here an Autodesk SkillBuilder that gives you a nice overview of one of the best inventor modules: the BOM. It was written back by Inventor 10 but still applies 100%, and should be part of the basic knowledge of every inventor user (unfortunately most of times it is not, but I am not surprised as I live in a nation where they call "BOM" the "PartList" 😅).
Hope it helps
Massimo Frison
CAD R&D // PDM Admin · Hekuma GmbH