Hi
Is there a way to fill in the interior volume of a solid as a different part?
Apologies, I am fairly new to inventor 2010 and not very keen on computers.
I understand there is a tool called sculpt which suppose to do this for you, but could you please tell me how or point me to an example.
I added a simplified model of what I need to do
Any help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Carlos
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi
Is there a way to fill in the interior volume of a solid as a different part?
Apologies, I am fairly new to inventor 2010 and not very keen on computers.
I understand there is a tool called sculpt which suppose to do this for you, but could you please tell me how or point me to an example.
I added a simplified model of what I need to do
Any help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Carlos
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by JDMather. Go to Solution.
Solved by JDMather. Go to Solution.
Your sketches are not constrained or making use of symmetry about the origin - I recommend starting here
http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/skillsusa%20university.pdf
Your sketches are not constrained or making use of symmetry about the origin - I recommend starting here
http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/skillsusa%20university.pdf
Personally, I prefer to avoid calculations when the geometry will return the answer (see attached).
Less prone to errors and fewer clicks to boot!
...and a really big advantage - if you change the geometry (within reason, for example not adding another hole) the answer is automatically updated for you. If you change the geometry subtantially (like adding another feature rather than simply changing size) it is still much easier to get updated answer than doing hand calculations (even if the hand calculation is simply a subtraction porblem).
...another big advantage to using multi-body with the Sculpt rather than combining is the second body is available for other things like Cores or analysis.
...and I suspect that is not what the OP was after anyhow
http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Inventor/How-to-fill-empty-volumes/m-p/3015056
cmbv, if you are interested in CFD you will need to become very keen on computers and when you post a question it helps if you include all of the information needed to get the solution you want. It is best to continue a discussion in a single thread until the solution is achieved.
Can you attach the real problem file here rather than the simplified representation?
Personally, I prefer to avoid calculations when the geometry will return the answer (see attached).
Less prone to errors and fewer clicks to boot!
...and a really big advantage - if you change the geometry (within reason, for example not adding another hole) the answer is automatically updated for you. If you change the geometry subtantially (like adding another feature rather than simply changing size) it is still much easier to get updated answer than doing hand calculations (even if the hand calculation is simply a subtraction porblem).
...another big advantage to using multi-body with the Sculpt rather than combining is the second body is available for other things like Cores or analysis.
...and I suspect that is not what the OP was after anyhow
http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Inventor/How-to-fill-empty-volumes/m-p/3015056
cmbv, if you are interested in CFD you will need to become very keen on computers and when you post a question it helps if you include all of the information needed to get the solution you want. It is best to continue a discussion in a single thread until the solution is achieved.
Can you attach the real problem file here rather than the simplified representation?
I would disagree with less mouse clicks. The OP is on 2010. Please expand the sculpt in your screenshot.
@Anonymous wrote:
Personally, I prefer to avoid calculations when the geometry will return the answer (see attached).
Less prone to errors and fewer clicks to boot!
I would disagree with less mouse clicks. The OP is on 2010. Please expand the sculpt in your screenshot.
@Anonymous wrote:
Personally, I prefer to avoid calculations when the geometry will return the answer (see attached).
Less prone to errors and fewer clicks to boot!
I don't remember what was in 2010, but all I did was -
1. Copy Object the original solid body as a Composite surface body.
2. Patch the holes with Boundary Patches.
3. Sculpt to new solid body.
4. Right click on solid body to get Properties.
I assume all of this avialable in 2010.
I don't remember what was in 2010, but all I did was -
1. Copy Object the original solid body as a Composite surface body.
2. Patch the holes with Boundary Patches.
3. Sculpt to new solid body.
4. Right click on solid body to get Properties.
I assume all of this avialable in 2010.
So, how come you can do that and I can't? I tried rebuilding that same model for practice, and I still get the "no effect on part" error. Sculpting patches only works if I DO NOT select "New solid". Is the pro version needed for this?
I have standard installation, Inventor 15.
So, how come you can do that and I can't? I tried rebuilding that same model for practice, and I still get the "no effect on part" error. Sculpting patches only works if I DO NOT select "New solid". Is the pro version needed for this?
I have standard installation, Inventor 15.
helllooooo ... anybody out there
helllooooo ... anybody out there
I am not familiar with using Inventor as an image editor.
I recommend that for Inventor help - you attach actual Inventor *.ipt file here rather than bitmap image files.
If you had attached ipt file a week ago - I would have responded in short order.
I suspect that I already know the step you missed from my list of steps years ago, but without the file...
(Hint: Step 1 in any list of steps is often the most important step.)
I am not familiar with using Inventor as an image editor.
I recommend that for Inventor help - you attach actual Inventor *.ipt file here rather than bitmap image files.
If you had attached ipt file a week ago - I would have responded in short order.
I suspect that I already know the step you missed from my list of steps years ago, but without the file...
(Hint: Step 1 in any list of steps is often the most important step.)
Okay, here is my ipt ... thanks
Okay, here is my ipt ... thanks
I don't see where you did Step 1.
There is no Composite surface body in your feature tree?
I don't see where you did Step 1.
There is no Composite surface body in your feature tree?
@Anonymous wrote:I am not familiar with using Inventor as an image editor.
I recommend that for Inventor help - you attach actual Inventor *.ipt file here rather than bitmap image files.
If you had attached ipt file a week ago - I would have responded in short order.
I suspect that I already know the step you missed from my list of steps years ago, but without the file...
(Hint: Step 1 in any list of steps is often the most important step.)
BTY, I was just following other post format, like your own ... that included nothing more than PNG file, and not an actual *.ipt file. But thanks for the tip, I'll keep that in mind ... "Do as I say, not as I do".
@Anonymous wrote:I am not familiar with using Inventor as an image editor.
I recommend that for Inventor help - you attach actual Inventor *.ipt file here rather than bitmap image files.
If you had attached ipt file a week ago - I would have responded in short order.
I suspect that I already know the step you missed from my list of steps years ago, but without the file...
(Hint: Step 1 in any list of steps is often the most important step.)
BTY, I was just following other post format, like your own ... that included nothing more than PNG file, and not an actual *.ipt file. But thanks for the tip, I'll keep that in mind ... "Do as I say, not as I do".
Have you installed Service Pack1 and Update 3?
I figured you would catch that I only posted image rather than file.
Have you installed Service Pack1 and Update 3?
I figured you would catch that I only posted image rather than file.
okay, now i'm really confused ...
... any chance you would join me on at my desktop through TeamViewer?
okay, now i'm really confused ...
... any chance you would join me on at my desktop through TeamViewer?
oh, I will see about updating also.
oh, I will see about updating also.
ross wrote:
... any chance you would join me on at my desktop through TeamViewer?
Maybe this will help.
Edit: Haaaaa, sorry about that - I keep forgetting that Screencast covers my browser. I will move to other side and create another recording.
ross wrote:
... any chance you would join me on at my desktop through TeamViewer?
Maybe this will help.
Edit: Haaaaa, sorry about that - I keep forgetting that Screencast covers my browser. I will move to other side and create another recording.
Awesome! Thanks so much for helping me understand how to better use the sculpt command. You saved the day.
BTY, how do I mark this response as "Accept as Solution"?
Awesome! Thanks so much for helping me understand how to better use the sculpt command. You saved the day.
BTY, how do I mark this response as "Accept as Solution"?
Only the original poster or an Expert Elite can Accept as Solution. Hopefully one of the EEs will jump in here and do that for you.
Sam B
Inventor Professional 2015 SP1 Update 3
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit, SP1
HP EliteBook 8770w; 8 GB RAM; Core™ i7-3720QM 2.60 GHz; Quadro K4000M
Only the original poster or an Expert Elite can Accept as Solution. Hopefully one of the EEs will jump in here and do that for you.
Sam B
Inventor Professional 2015 SP1 Update 3
Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit, SP1
HP EliteBook 8770w; 8 GB RAM; Core™ i7-3720QM 2.60 GHz; Quadro K4000M
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.