I have to complete this case... It happens that there is an "incompatibility" between those 2 instructions
- inventorApp.activeDocument.save() and
- component.isActive(MakePath("parentlevell","component")) = true
Here under a more detailed reporting. It is a nogo bug. actually, it cant be viable to renounce either to activation of component or on the save of the corresponding document !!!!
Hi Adam,
I succeeded in isolating one problem that is fully clear in our software.
In TürDesigner SW, it is impossible to have both
- A request for activation of a component,
- A request for save of a document.
That means both instruction can’t cohabit in the same SW !!!
We have the instruction _invApp.ActiveDocument.save() in TürDesigner
And we have instructions such as Component.isActive(MakePaht(„xxx“,“yyy“) = true (or false) in Ganzglassfüllung.vb
You CANT maintain those 2 kinds of instruction simultaneously in the code !!!!
Please, did you already hear about that ?
Is this a well known bug ?
Clearly, it cant be accepted that we cant save wenn we activate/deactivate a component….
Is there a patch fort hat ?
If there is one, could please forward it to me with high precedence ?
It is now more than one month that we are stuck with this problem…
Did other developer encounter this problem ?
Could you reproduce this problem in the environment I sent to you ?
I sent you everything to settle that for one week, with a guide how to start it and to activate this sequence…
I already gave you clues about the problem in my tickets…
I didnt see a post refering to this problem on the forum…
I also didn’t receive support relating to my tickets (2 tickets created at 2 different places)
I didnt receive either any response to the case that I posted on the forum of inventor…
As it been solved through a patch already ?
PS : what is funny ist hat we can use isActive as a getter, but not as a setter (it is a fact that ist naming makes more reference to a getter, but the exemples I saw allowed tot hink that the instructions that are in Tür Designer are syntactically correct.
Best Regards
