Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Inventor: Difference between assembled part and single part in Stress Analysis

6 REPLIES 6
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 7
Anonymous
248 Views, 6 Replies

Inventor: Difference between assembled part and single part in Stress Analysis

Good Morning guys,

 

I have a question on how inventor works as a assembled part. 

Giving an example of a box, I can decide to assemble 6 parts to produce a box. Other way around is single part(simply done with extrusion and shell command).

 

What are the difference of these and how it will affect the stress analysis. 

How about weldment that was suppose to be there? 

What is the best method to design your machine in engineering industry? 

 

Thank you 

 


@Anonymous,

marius.gildehaus has edited your subject line for clarity
Original: Difference between assembled part and single part


6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
IgorMir
in reply to: Anonymous

Are you studying toward diploma in Engineering? I hope so. The question you have asked requires a course in engineering discipline to answer.

Cheers,

Igor.

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 3 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: IgorMir

I have graduated with engineering degree. working in a firm now 

Message 4 of 7
johnsonshiue
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi! Inventor is trying to simulate real world conditions. So, for a given material, a shelled body is definitely structure-wise stronger than a 5-sided box of the same material. In an assembly, Inventor simulate the condition via Contact, meaning the mesh elements between two bodies touching each other but they are not merged together.

I think you should create your design and set up your simulation as close to real world as possible. If you are designing a 5-sided box, you should not use a shelled box to simulate and vice versa.

Many thanks!



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 5 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: johnsonshiue

Thank you johnson,

 

As of you mentioned that the i should try to simulate so close to the real world, Do i have to assemble with weldment? will the additional procedure,weldment, after constraining all the parts together, make a difference in future analysis? 

 

Thank you 

 

Message 6 of 7
johnsonshiue
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi! As I mentioned earlier, you should construct your model as close as real world. If you will weld the box, you should create weld beads.

Many thanks!



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 7 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: johnsonshiue

Thanks alot !! 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report