@david.karoly I don't understand what you mean at all.
The bending table is a manual tool.
Both the bend table and the K-factor are elements of the same equation from two different sides. The K factor multiplies the radii and the table calculates the difference in values. The end result is the same - finding the nominal length for the neutral axis (plane).
The main difference (besides the mathematical formula) is the workflow of these tools.
In the case of the K coefficient, we are dealing with multiplication, so once the parameter is defined, it is used to calculate all value variants.
In the case of a table it is similar - but you have to prepare a whole series of samples, because... there is no multiplication; is direct correction. Therefore, you should prepare as many samples (different variants) as you can, and then complete the table. The remaining (intermediate) positions will be calculated interpolationally.
This is exactly what the bend table workflow looks like:
- You bend 10 details (same radius, different angle)
- You count the differences
- You fill in the cells
- You work and design - You use the table even with undefined values, counting on the correct accuracy of the calculated interpolations.
And so for each radius xD.
This is the only way, because the bending table is a manual tool.
You have to work through it. Prepare samples, measure, calculate and complete the table. And so for each thickness, radius, angle and technology (k-factor). Then it will work your way.
You cannot expect the table to be correct right away - it is not adapted to your technology and material (i.e. it is calculated for a different K-factor).
This is your task - you must complete the table; then it will be correct. And you will be able to use it.
Expecting top-down bending table compliance shows a misunderstanding of this tool and process.