Hi Johnson;
I don't want to be argumentative here, however can't help but to say - what you have described for Inventor is fully applicable to AutoCAD. AutoCAD is although a pretty powerful 3D tool. It works differently though. But claiming that AutoCAD is just for 2D drawings - that statement reflects the state of affairs which was circa R9 (1980) or there about. R12 had already have reasonably well developed 3D capabilities. I have done a lot of 3D modelling in R13. And in follow up releases as well, prior to go with Inventor R7.
My point is - to call AutoCAD just a 2D tool is not fair. For the same token - Inventor can be called 2D tool as well. That's if the user is using Inventor's sketch capabilities only in a Drawing environment.
Cheers,
Igor.
@johnsonshiue wrote:
Hi Asif,
Many thanks for your comments! But, I disagree with some of your points. Comparing AutoCAD to Inventor, is a bit like comparing apples to oranges. The two tools may have some narrow overlap but for the most part, they are for two different purposes.
AutoCAD was originally designed for 2D drafting for various industries. Its ability to create accurate, great quality, and highly customizable engineering drawings is second to none. It is simply the best in the industry at the moment. Inventor on the other hand is meant to create precise 3D geometry for manufacturing purpose. The geometry created in Inventor (and similar CAD systems) has to be precise and well defined. Every point on the model has to be measurable. Every dimension can drive geometric change. The 2D drawing is simply the by-product of the 3D model.
Many thanks!
Web: www.meqc.com.au