Comentario
07-11-2023
07:05 AM
- editado
07-11-2023
07:12 AM
07-11-2023
07:05 AM
- editado
07-11-2023
07:12 AM
@Mike.FORM
Right. That's correct.
Didn't see any reference to schedules in the description.
A work around will be to have a prefix to the Level names. 0F Level>1F Level, >etc.
Even then, levels below grade can get problematic.
But yes, proper sorting by level should be by the level height/order, not the name of the level.
When selecting the level placement for building elements, those levels are listed by the associated level by the height, so I presume this shouldn't be difficult to implement