Wrong post-code for fanuc in G73

[ghost24SBH9Z]

I have a problem.

When i use the cycle chip breaker the post code is not correct becuse don't show me the cycle G73 but all the movements in G0 and G1 to execute the drill cycle.

How i can solve?

[KrupalVala]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z 

open your post in any editor and search  case "chip-breaking": Now change below code from

case "chip-breaking":
      if ((cycle.accumulatedDepth < cycle.depth) || (P > 0)) {

to

case "chip-breaking":
        // cycle.accumulatedDepth is ignored
        if (P > 0) {

save the post and test it carefully.

Thanks,

[ghost24SBH9Z]

This is my post now after your advice but anything change

case "chip breaking":
      //(cycle.accumulatedDepth < cycle.depth) ||
      if (P > 0) {
        expandCyclePoint(x, y, z);
      } else {
        writeBlock(
          gRetractModal.format(98), gCycleModal.format(73),
          getCommonCycle(x, y, z, cycle.retract, cycle.clearance),
          "Q" + xyzFormat.format(cycle.incrementalDepth),
          feedOutput.format(F)
        );

[KrupalVala]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z ,

Yes. now test it. 

[ghost24SBH9Z]

I already tested it but doesn't work

[KrupalVala]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z ,

Given solution should work. please check with  latest fanuc post. Else try with below codes.

case "chip-breaking":

      if ((P > 0)) {

        expandCyclePoint(x, y, z);

      } else {

        writeBlock(

          (properties.type == "A") ? "" : gRetractModal.format(98), conditional(properties.type != "A", gAbsIncModal.format(90)), gCycleModal.format(73),

          getCommonCycle(x, y, z, cycle.retract),

          peckOutput.format(cycle.incrementalDepth),

          feedOutput.format(F)

        );

      }

      break;

thanks,

[ghost24SBH9Z]

Post processor engine: 4.5699.0
Configuration path: D:\Programmi_Installati\Utilit� Fusion360\Post-Processor\dmg mori nhx.cps
Security level: 1000
Include paths: D:\Programmi_Installati\Utilit� Fusion360\Post-Processor
Configuration modification date: Sunday, August 16, 2020 6:06:47 PM
Output path: C:\Users\ghost\AppData\Local\Fusion 360 CAM\nc\1.nc
Checksum of intermediate NC data: 5c5eeee05591e9985fd472e5af0a1ab3
Checksum of configuration: 6a0fa0ff5b03704d0be19b37ec6e12a5
Vendor url: http://en.dmgmori.com
Legal: Copyright (C) 2012-2020 by Autodesk, Inc.
Generato da: Fusion 360 CAM 2.0.8809
...
Warning(D:\Programmi_Installati\Utilit� Fusion360\Post-Processor\dmg mori nhx.cps:1526): reference to undefined property properties.type
Warning(D:\Programmi_Installati\Utilit� Fusion360\Post-Processor\dmg mori nhx.cps:1526): reference to undefined property properties.type

###############################################################################
Errore: ReferenceError: peckOutput is not defined
Error at line: 1528
Error in operation: 'Foratura8'

Stack dump:
onCyclePoint(-397.5,-37.5,207.5)@D:\Programmi_Installati\Utilit￠ Fusion360\Post-Processor\dmg mori nhx.cps:1527
Failed while processing onCycle() for record 386.
###############################################################################

Errore: Failed to execute configuration.
Stop time: Sunday, August 16, 2020 6:06:58 PM
Post processing failed.

[KrupalVala]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z ,

please share your post processor file (*.cps). 

Thanks,

[ghost24SBH9Z]

There is.

[KrupalVala]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z ,

I though you are using Fanuc generic post. No problem. based on your post i have updated the code.

 case "chip-breaking":
        if ((P > 0)) {
          expandCyclePoint(x, y, z);
        } else {
          writeBlock(
            gRetractModal.format(98), gCycleModal.format(73),
            getCommonCycle(x, y, z, cycle.retract, cycle.clearance),
            "Q" + xyzFormat.format(cycle.incrementalDepth),
            feedOutput.format(F)
          );
        }
        break;

Save the post and test it carefully.

[ghost24SBH9Z]

ok great!!

Thank you so much for your help.

Now it work.

[KrupalVala · Accepted solution]

Hi @ghost24SBH9Z ,

Thanks your for your feedback. There was a diff. in cycle name-> chip breaking &  chip-breaking.  That's why first solution did not work.

IF my answer solve your question, could you please click the "Accept Solution" button ? This helps everyone find answers more quickly!  

Thanks,