Announcements
Autodesk Community will be read-only between April 26 and April 27 as we complete essential maintenance. We will remove this banner once completed. Thanks for your understanding

"Odd" behaving Sweep... or is it me?

raphaelgiudizio
Observer

"Odd" behaving Sweep... or is it me?

raphaelgiudizio
Observer
Observer

Hi, I'm trying to make a Sweep along a 3D path to make a frame. It's a very simple rectangle along a path actually. Now I get this twist, which I think has something to do with the 'normal' of the lines or something, I don't know. If included a picture, which should explain the problem, and I also included the drawing file.

Has anyone any idea how to solve this? I also already tried to make the frame of separate sweeps per line (so 4 separate sweeps) but than I run into other problems, maybe because I want to have some measurements of the construction sketch by a Variable Parameter.

Any idea's? thanks.

0 Likes
Reply
325 Views
8 Replies
Replies (8)

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@raphaelgiudizio wrote:

 

Any idea's? thanks.


@raphaelgiudizio 

See Attached.

2 Likes

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

very clever, @TheCADWhisperer !


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
0 Likes

@raphaelgiudizio 

Just to clarify - I am not real happy with my "solution" but want to verify that I am on the right track.

0 Likes

raphaelgiudizio
Observer
Observer

@TheCADWhisperer 

Hi, thanks for your reply and attempt for a solutions. And ideed a clever idea, but.. :).. and here it comes. It would have been a fine solutions if I only wanted to make a rendering or something. When I need a cad drawing with actual measurements this doesn't work. Just look at the Variables I've made and set the "Raam_Curve" to something like 80 and the profile's all of the sudden become very big on the bottom and thin at the top.. So if I wanted to make a frame, let's say, out of steel, I couldn't have a tecnical drawing.

0 Likes

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@raphaelgiudizio 

This will take a bit more work than you might expect.

I assume you want this as 4 Components.

Do you want butt joints or miter joints?

0 Likes

@raphaelgiudizio 

See Attached.

0 Likes

raphaelgiudizio
Observer
Observer

@TheCADWhisperer, @jeff_strater 

Hi, First of all, thank u so much for putting in your time. 

Further I know I'm might be a bit demanding .. 🙂  but in your drawing the profile's are not exacty neatly inline, which they have to be for my project. See attached picture I took from your drawing.

Now I might have an actual answer myself, Happy days.. Still working on the drawing at the moment but I'm very close, I think. Oh and they can be butt joints btw. And in my drawing the hole frame can be one component, ready for connection to other components with joints..I'll let u know..

 

NotInline .jpg

0 Likes

raphaelgiudizio
Observer
Observer

@TheCADWhisperer @jeff_strater 

Hi, in fact, hehe.. only half an hour later now, and.. tada.. it works. NOT with one simple sweep or pipetool or anything, but with a sweep/extrude per profile. In my original post/question I mentioned that this solution gave me 'other problems', but apparently that was just one referencepoint that was pointing to a previous body instead of a projection. This confused fusion apparently.

So I got what I need, and it's a lot more work than just one simply sweep but at least I can go on with the project I need it for. Now all the measurements are controlled by user parameters, so I can make the frame big or small and even the profile's thick or thin with only 5 parameters..and everything stays inline.

Thanks and have a good day all.

0 Likes