Make internal component an external link

Make internal component an external link

Anonymous
Not applicable
5,744 Views
7 Replies
Message 1 of 8

Make internal component an external link

Anonymous
Not applicable

I'm working on a pair of glasses in Fusion. I created 1 Fusion file and have 2 sub assemblies within - 1 for the front frame and another sub-assembly for the arm.

I need to make the arm sub-assembly available to be used in different Fusion files, but keep them linked. So if I modify them, they update everywhere they're used. In Solidworks, I would click on the sub-assembly and choose save externally. Then I could import it into other files. But I don't see that option. 

 

Thanks
Alex

5,745 Views
7 Replies
Replies (7)
Message 2 of 8

julia.paganucci
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

HI @Anonymous , 

 

Thanks for posting! If you right click on the component that you are using, clicking on "Save Copy As" will create a new Fusion design of the individual component. This design will be found in the Fusion 360 Data Panel but will not be linked to the original assembly/component group file. More information here and here. If you bring this file into any assemblies, it can be linked and will update as the individual file is change. 

 

Thanks,

Julia Paganucci

Technical Support Specialist



| Autodesk Knowledge Network | My Screencasts | Fusion 360 Webinars | Tips and Best Practices

Message 3 of 8

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Anonymous - another option here is to use Derive to create a linked external representation of the internal component.  Save Copy As will work, but it then becomes an independent design that has no links to the original.  Derive will maintain that link to the original internal component, so if it updates, the Derived design will be out of date and can be updated.

 

Let me know if you need more details, I can record a screencast.

 


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
Message 4 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thank you, both options sound good but I think derive would be the more appropriate way. A screen cast would be really useful if possible?

0 Likes
Message 5 of 8

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

@a.devane - here is a screencast of the Derive method:

 

 

 


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
Message 6 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

Perfect! That’s exactly what I was looking for

Message 7 of 8

Anonymous
Not applicable

Unfortunately this hasn't worked. I've derived the part into the new file but it's not showing up there.Screenshot 2019-03-05 at 00.31.27.png

0 Likes
Message 8 of 8

jeff_strater
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Anonymous - can you provide a bit more info to help us understand what didn't work?  It looks like you have a Derive feature in your model.  If you use the Derive workflow that I showed, and select "new design", it should produce an entirely new design with only that Derive feature in it.  It looks like you may have followed a slightly different workflow than I did.  Ideally, if you can provide a screencast of what you did, and the design that you want to use, it will be easier to help you.  Thanks!

 


Jeff Strater
Engineering Director
0 Likes