Announcements
Autodesk Community will be read-only between April 26 and April 27 as we complete essential maintenance. We will remove this banner once completed. Thanks for your understanding

Maintaining High Performance while Patterning?

durahl
Enthusiast Enthusiast
420 Views
6 Replies
Message 1 of 7

Maintaining High Performance while Patterning?

durahl
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Greetings!

 

I've recently picked up an old project of mine and have again run into the same problem as before - Performance Issues when creating patterns with high part counts / lots of details.

 

The below picture shows an as accurate as possible recreation of a Tamiya 1:16 Scale RC Tank Turret Bearing Race including the 246 teeth - The latter of which was, to put it mildly, a huge P.I.T.A. to pattern as it take my PC like 5min to do the calculation turning F360 unresponsive during the entire process:

Working with the completed bearing race once finished - like importing it into the DIY Tank Model I'm working on - caused no issues whatsoever but the patterning problem for such highdetail parts is brutal despite F360 at that time barely scratching 10% in CPU Utilization.

 

Am I missing something? 🤔

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
421 Views
6 Replies
Replies (6)
Message 2 of 7

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,

How did you create the pattern?

In the screencast you can follow the creation in real time.

 

günther

0 Likes
Message 3 of 7

durahl
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I did it exactly like that on the actual part.

 

Because of my amazement at the speed of your screencast while watching it on my Couch PC I went and redid it on the that PC and there too it would do the patterning almost instantaneously - I then tried it again ( simple ring plus the teeth ) on my Main PC and while it didn't take as long as before after immediately displaying the instances of the teeth it sure took like 30sec do finalize the calculation.

 

Am I looking at a potential CPU / GPU related issue? 🤔 The Main PC is like 5 generations older than my Couch PC i9-9900KS...

0 Likes
Message 4 of 7

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

Hi, 

this is (hardware-wise) exclusively a question of CPU speed* (not cores).


*3.6 Ghz for me

 

günther

1 Like
Message 5 of 7

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

As @g-andresen has already mentioned, this is a matter of pure single core CPU frequency.

Patterning is a modeling operation performed by the geometric modeling kernel.

 

The math and algorithms used by that geometric modeling kernel don't always lend themselves to parallelization. As such a more modern CPU with a high clock frequency and high sustained boost/turbo clock frequency such as in the "KS" processors make quite a difference.    


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 6 of 7

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

Can you File>Export your *.f3d (original) file to your local drive and then Attach it here to a Reply?

0 Likes
Message 7 of 7

durahl
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

@g-andresen @TrippyLighting :
I guess that makes sense then... The Main PC is an i7-5930K running at 3.7GHz whereas the Couch PC, as mentioned, is a i9-9900KF running at 5GHz - Not exactly the world of a difference warranting a 5min coffee break, but I guess System Architecture may also play a role 🤔

 

Thanks for the information! 😁

 

@TheCADWhisperer 

With the above provided explanations I'd describe my issue as resolved.

0 Likes