Hi,
Is there a way to work out where the problem lies in the model for the "inconsistent graph vertices" error?
No errors in the model reported.
I got this error while doing and Inspect / Interference operation. In I switch on included coincident faces I don;t get the error and it shows the interferences as 0, which I expected.
Thanks
David
Hi @HarrisonClassic ! I suspect I know what is going on. This is a case where a low-level error is leaking out to the real world. We attempt to translate these into more human-readable form, but sometimes there is no available translation.
What I suspect is happening here is: The Interference command uses the same kernel API as Combine. In fact, what Interference really is is just that - a hidden Combine command, set to "intersect". These kinds of errors occur primarily when you have geometries that are nearly identical, and on top of each other. Knowing a bit about your process, this does not surprise me. Not to imply that your process is wrong, only that it can generate these nearly-coincident faces. In fact, that is why that coincident faces toggle exists in Interference - to take those out of the operation, to avoid these kinds of problems. So, that is a long way to say: It's OK to ignore that error, and if you get the right results with coincident faces off, then that should be accurate.
Fusion
