Feedback: Shared Components
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
I wonder if I am alone in the annoyance of this error. Annoyed at the feeling that this very issue seems to run counter intuitive to the nature of a linked system where all projects can be linked as files. Unless there is some setting or command that I have over looked to enable?
The example I will offer. I created files under a project that included many parts. These are files that replicate vendor supplied parts, nuts, bolts, battery cells, and PCB assemblies. Another project and a similar structure. It would be nice to start breaking down the sub folders and organizing those parts in a way that will be useful to future projects and in a way I can, if only one at a time, or by replicating the files and abandoning all development data in the process.
Honestly I thought this was an old issue resolved long ago. I was rudely awakened to the fact it is still an issue, when trying to pull some a component from another design into a newer unrelated design. Though it will copy the object as stand alone duplicate data. That is not wanted, even if 'there are times when the option to do so is useful.'
What this means is that there is no way to work with a single master copy of any one object over several files or projects. All files are master unto the project they are stored within. So user must export and import or copy over to maintain a file. Again counter intuitive to the nature of the product.
---
Even though I don't develop commercially. I paid for two reasons. To share files with my employer who has decided to refuse all shares since they don't understand the license system at all. The other reason was to work with multiple files and be done with the restrictions on files. Seems that even after paying not all are fully lifted. -And now the prices are going up.
I should have rather preferred to send the issue as feedback directly and quietly. But AutoDesk doesn't seem to want feedback it needs to be posted to the forums. There is a feedback forums but it's restricted. So ya, I don't think they don't want actual feed back from real users. So we have to complain publicly, in the support forums on on Facebook. Id rather reserve public complaints for repeat offenders. Most developers offer a discreet portal for feedback so that it doesn't all have to be public.