Announcements
Autodesk Community will be read-only between April 26 and April 27 as we complete essential maintenance. We will remove this banner once completed. Thanks for your understanding

Apple M2 Pro and Max

JGttk
Contributor Contributor
1,734 Views
9 Replies
Message 1 of 10

Apple M2 Pro and Max

JGttk
Contributor
Contributor

Hello 

 

In a hypothetical case where we don't have to use Rosetta anymore, and Apple M2 is fully supported in Fusion 360, would be a smart decision to move to those M2 processors? Would Fusion 360 take benefit from the M2 Max with the extra GPU? Or perhaps M2 Max would be a waste and perhaps M2 Pro is just enough?

 

Why I ask? My desktop (PC) does a great job, but is a desktop machine, and can't take it with me, for the go I have an Apple MacBook Pro 2015 that just can't handle everything (never have actually), yes I could buy say an MSI or DELL workstation, but for the same money I can get an M2 Pro or M2 Max, plus I do enjoy working on the MacBook Pro.

 

What is the M2 Pro and M2 Max consensus in relation to Fusion 360 in 2023? 

 

Right question in the wrong place? sorry, not my intention just didn't know where to ask this!

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
1,735 Views
9 Replies
Replies (9)
Message 2 of 10

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

In general for any CAD software, higher core counts do not matter much as modeling and timeline/history based CAD modeling is mostly single core.

If you like local or canvas rendering, the CPU core count makes a difference. Rendering uses ever core.

The GPU makes even less of a difference. Fusion 360 utilizes the CPU only for viewport display.

 


EESignature

2 Likes
Message 3 of 10

JGttk
Contributor
Contributor

Thanks for you answer.

 

Yes to all those points, but Fusion 360 can still benefit from a beefy VRAM, so local rendering is always going to be faster with a good GPU.

 

As for the cores, yes Ghz is the number to look at, but again for example the 2.8Ghz I7-4980HQ on my 8 year old Mac does better job than I7-3610QM 2.3Ghz on my 12 year old Asus (both with 16Gb ram and with integrated GPUs), and both get smoked out of the water with I7-12700KF with speed of 2.7Ghz EC and 3.6Ghz PC on my desktop machine, in short quad cores vs 12 cores, the frequency is not that different as you can see but the performance on those machines is totally different.

 

You might say that is all about the Ghz on single processing, but for me is the whole picture is important to look at, for example newer CPUs with a good Turbo boost and a GPU with enough VRAM, again I'm just an user no an expert by any means, hence the question about what to get, sure Autodesk's list of requirements exist but it doesn't give me the whole picture.

 

Need to be mobile and be as efficient as on my desktop machine, but I don't wan't to go full on workstation machine price because I don't think I need it, and I believe I won't benefit from the hardware on those machines, that's why asked about those new M2's, if the common idea is still "No Good", then I might go with an MSI machine i9-12900H 2.5Ghz PC, 32Gb, RTX A3000 12Gb. The thing is that Apple M2 max cost as much as that MSI machine, and that's my head scratcher. Thanks again.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 10

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

@JGttk wrote:

 

 

Yes to all those points, but Fusion 360 can still benefit from a beefy VRAM, so local rendering is always going to be faster with a good GPU.

 


I am not entirely sure what you are referring to with "local rendering", but for raytracing in the render workspace Fusion 350 does not utilize the GPU.

The GPU is only used for viewport display and a GPU with "beefy" VRAM makes relatively little difference as long as you have enough of it so Fusion 360 can waste it on unnecessary screen gimmicks. However, those can also be turned off.

 

Having that said in reference to the MSI notebook with A2000. You won't get any speed benefit from an A2000 compared with a gaming GPU with the same chip set using Fusion 360 (or Autodesk Inventor). These "pro" graphics cards have certified drivers optimized mostly for  OpenGL. Fusion 360 and Autodesk Inventor do not use OpenGL but DirectX.

 

Single core frequency is obviously not the "only" metric that is important. For modeling in CAD software (any parametric CAD software, not just Fusion 360)  it is simply more important than core count. Memory bandwidth and clock speed , SSD speed and other factors make  difference when comparing pure hardware specs. 

 

Until Fusion 360 runs natively on the new apple hardware it will be difficult to assess, just how Fusion 360 runs on these machines. In another thread it was stated by AD that we can expect to see it sometime this summer. Also I believe on the mac platform Fusion 360 will utilize the Metal API for graphics.

 

But then, hardware specs are only part of the story. I started working with Fusion 360 on a mid 2010 Intel 27" iMac. That machine still works just fine, I just don't use it for Fusion 360. In 2017 I got the fastest MackBook Pro available  and worked for the next few years with Fusion 360 on it.

At my current employer I work with a Dell Precision 7550 with a Nvidia Quadro T2000. It is a little bit faster than the macbook, but not much. 

However it is much heavier, much bulkier and much, louder. The fans on the GPU start spinning almost at full speed as soon as I rotate anything in Fusion 360's viewport.

Professionally I develop manufacturing automation concepts. Once a week we review concepts and new business opportunities. If I have a more involved concept batteries run empty sometimes within an hour. That is with me taking it into the meeting fully charged!

 

Hence, when I travel to customers I take my 2017 MacBook 😉

Also, while I don't use the Trackpad for CAD on the MacBook, for me it makes the computer. The trackpad on the Dell machine is barely tolerable and let's not forget about the screen. The MacBook completely blows away the Dell machine in that aspect as well. Not even remotely close.  

 

Long story short, If I'd be in the market for a new Notebook Computer I'd go hands down with a M1 or M2 MacBook Pro!

I personally also would also max it out. E.g. M2 with as much RAM as fit in the budget. 

 

The combination of:

  • the lower weight
  • the lack of obnoxious fan noise
  • the buttery smooth trackpad experience
  • the outstanding screen and
  • the phenomenal battery life

 

for me personally the make this almost a no-brainer, aside from pure performance considerations. 

 

For the 3D stuff I do privately (Fusion 360, ZW3D, Blender, Indigo Renderer, Sidefx Houdini and others)  I built myself a PC early last year with a 16 Core Ryzen 5950X, 64GB of Ram and RTX 3070ti.

So I am not a typical mac or Fusion 360 fanboy 😉 


EESignature

2 Likes
Message 5 of 10

JGttk
Contributor
Contributor

Thanks for the long and extended answer, appreciated.

 

You obviously know more than me when it comes to squeeze performance out of an old machine, your Macbook is only 2 year newer than mine (perhaps you have DG?) And for how you describe it seems you are not replacing it any time soon. If you can make it work in parallel with that Dell Precision 7550 then you sure know your thing. As I'm writing this, I'm working on my Macbook and moving simple parts is just way too slow, lags like crazy (yes maybe we have to blame that point in between the chair and the MacBook as the main problem, I know).

 

Anyhow, got my info and validation from your answer, so thanks for that!

0 Likes
Message 6 of 10

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@JGttk wrote:

...

 

... (perhaps you have DG?)...


If you mean Dedicated or Discrete Graphics, then, yes definitely. While it seems to work for some, I would not have recommended Intel's on-board graphics for any 3D work.

With the new Apple silicon, fortunately that isn't a choice anymore.

 


@JGttk wrote:

...As I'm writing this, I'm working on my Macbook and moving simple parts is just way too slow, lags like crazy...


If you are interested sharing a design, I'd be happy to look at it. Perhaps I can provide some pointers that help with performance. I have tutored other instrument makers in the use of Fusion 360 😉


EESignature

1 Like
Message 7 of 10

JGttk
Contributor
Contributor
Well thanks, I'll be glad to share some project so you can tell me what I'm doing wrong, how can I share it with you?
0 Likes
Message 8 of 10

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

If you are using a paid subscription you can send me the public link to a project though a PM.

If you use a free subscription, send me a PM and we can exchange emails and then data.


EESignature

1 Like
Message 9 of 10

tomae
Collaborator
Collaborator

You can always buy the Macbook and return it within 14 days (I believe) if it doesn't meet your needs.  I did that a few years back and they did the return, no questions asked.

-Tom

 

 

2 Likes
Message 10 of 10

JGttk
Contributor
Contributor

Yup, very true valid point, thanks 👍

0 Likes