Lofting a straight line does not remain straight

Lofting a straight line does not remain straight

Corvin.Huber
Contributor Contributor
850 Views
13 Replies
Message 1 of 14

Lofting a straight line does not remain straight

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

Hello!
I am creating a bracket to be attached to a wing-strut.
When lofting profiles along two rails, a straight section of a profile (that should follow the contour of the strut) does not remain straight.
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you!

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
851 Views
13 Replies
Replies (13)
Message 2 of 14

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,

Please share the file for reply.

File > export > save as f3d on local drive  > attach to post.

 

günther

0 Likes
Message 3 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

Here comes ...

0 Likes
Message 4 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Although I find the results not entirely satisfactory, I'd use a sweep to create side rails and then use surface lofts to create this shape.

 

TrippyLighting_0-1717426433155.png

 


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 5 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

Servus Peter! 
I wonder why Fusion distorts the planar surface the way it does. I believe it has something to do with the linear distribution of cross-sectional areas ... it appears to be a logical glitch to me.
Thanks you for your approach! It works since the side-rails seem to fix the linear element.
In the meantime I had experimented with creating and outside shape and the extruding the inside shape to cut it out.
Who at SolidWorks would one need to talk to in order to understand this phenomenon?
Cheers,
Corvin

0 Likes
Message 6 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@Corvin.Huber wrote:

 

...
Who at SolidWorks would one need to talk to in order to understand this phenomenon?
...


Fusion is a product of Autodesk.

SolidWorks is a product of Dassault Systems.

You are on the Fusion forum 😉

 

The explanation is easy. You need side rails to control the edge flow of the loft.


EESignature

Message 7 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

This is the erstwhile result:

0 Likes
Message 8 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

f3d is here:

0 Likes
Message 9 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

Sorry about the mix-up. No offence meant.

 

Understand your explanation (side rails) but still am intrigued what the program "is thinking". I am pretty sure it has something to do with cross-section area distribution along the length of the rail.

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Cheers,

Corvin

0 Likes
Message 10 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Ok. Do you still need help with this?


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 11 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

@Corvin.Huber wrote:

 

Understand your explanation (side rails) but still am intrigued what the program "is thinking". I am pretty sure it has something to do with cross-section area distribution along the length of the rail.

 


The program creates a loft according to the constraints you give it. If you don't constrain the loft to follow specific edges it won't. It will create its own arbitrary edge.

The last file is different from the first model. I would stay away from conic curves!

I would create the strut profile and Outside contour sketches first.

Then I would extrude (not sweep, I don't know what I was thinking) the Strut profile symmetrically to Bracket_Width.

Then I would create the loft profile sketches.

Intersect-projecting the strut profile and the outside contour into each profile sketch will create a line where the strut profile pierces through the sketch plane and a point where the outside contour pierces through the sketch plane.

Then constrain the profile splines trough those points.

Now you can loft with predictable results.

 

 

 


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 12 of 14

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Another tip is to avoid offsetting spline curves. It won't have much of an effect in this design, but an have detrimental effect in other designs.

 

You can see the "artifacts" in the curvature of the offset spline:

TrippyLighting_0-1717440180307.png

 

 

Those aren't present in the original spline.


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 13 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

Very interesting detail, Peter!

This (partly) answer a question I have had. I create3d a complex wing shell with lofted wing profiles (which had splines) and tried to offset it. Quite frequently, the offset penetrated through the original surface. It seems that there is a challenge with contour smoothness on rosetted splines.

 

Thank you for your help!

 

Corvin

0 Likes
Message 14 of 14

Corvin.Huber
Contributor
Contributor

... dang autocorrect. ... answers a question ... offsetted not rosetted ...

 

0 Likes