Problems with "trace" when chamfering

Problems with "trace" when chamfering

ole.alex
Participant Participant
682 Views
13 Replies
Message 1 of 14

Problems with "trace" when chamfering

ole.alex
Participant
Participant

Hey

I'm trying to follow the Titan-9M tutorial and found some bugs with the trace toolpath when chamfering.
Chamfer tip offset does not move the tool sideways, it just moves the tip down so too much material is removed.
The tool should be possible to move sideways to avoid a burr being left by the tip.

olealex_0-1679832181830.png

olealex_1-1679832199105.png

olealex_2-1679832289975.png


I might also mention that "radial stock to leave" does nothing either so any setting that should move the tip of the tool sideways does nothing, only the settings for vertical movement of the toolpath works.

 

0 Likes
683 Views
13 Replies
Replies (13)
Message 2 of 14

ole.alex
Participant
Participant

It seems like the trace operation is missing the "red arrow" directional function so the toolpath just blindly follow the countour with the center of the tool.

olealex_0-1679833175328.png

 

Screenshot from the Titan-9M video using the trace function for chamfering

olealex_1-1679833276733.png

 

 

0 Likes
Message 3 of 14

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

It sounds like you've still got Trace set to "Center" for it's compensation. Set it to "Left" or Right" for the arrow to appear as well as for Stock to Leave to have an effect


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


Message 4 of 14

ole.alex
Participant
Participant

Thank you.
Your solution works, but unless "chamfer tip offset" has a value an "unexpected error" message appears.
Might be an idea to make this a little more intuitive by adding am actual error message that helps with the problem.

olealex_0-1679835269722.png

 

0 Likes
Message 5 of 14

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

Please share your file here so we can see the steps needed to produce this error.

File > Export > Save to local folder, return to thread and attach the .f3d/f3z file in your reply


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 6 of 14

ole.alex
Participant
Participant

With sideways compensation left and chamfer turned off this error is generated:

olealex_0-1679837647034.png

 

 

 

With sideways compensation left and chamfer enabled, but values set to 0 gives this error:

 

olealex_2-1679837730651.png

 

 

 

 

 

0 Likes
Message 7 of 14

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hmm, interesting. I'll look into this at some point today or tomorrow and get it logged if needed


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 8 of 14

ole.alex
Participant
Participant

Thank you Seth!

0 Likes
Message 9 of 14

benjamintoews
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Wonderful! I didnt even think of it that there might be a "center" option. I was wondering why trace wasnt offsetting.
0 Likes
Message 10 of 14

benjamintoews
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Now if they would just give us a chamfer clearance like the chamfer cycle...

0 Likes
Message 11 of 14

oleg.tikhomirov
Autodesk
Autodesk

I've created CAM-44210 about crash in Trace.

Unfortunatelly "Chamfer clearance" isn't supported right now. Mainly because Trace isn't model aware strategy.



Oleg Tikhomirov
Software Engineer
0 Likes
Message 12 of 14

programming2C78B
Advisor
Advisor

Why not just use the chamfer or 2D contour toolpath....trace really isn't ideal or possibly even meant for this. 

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 13 of 14

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager

@programming2C78B cuz it's a 3D surface, 2D Contour or Chamfer won't work


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 14 of 14

benjamintoews
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
I just created a sketch line about 1/8” short of the shoulder because my chamfer cutter is 1/4”. Then I selected this line instead of the model edge. Works great, it’s just a little more work.
0 Likes