New Tormach Post giving empty file!

Anonymous

New Tormach Post giving empty file!

Anonymous
Not applicable

Just downloaded new Tormach Post processor and now when I post a simple operation with 4th axis wrap - the file is empty!

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-20 at 4.44.54 PM.png

When I post with the Newest Tormach post I get this:

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-20 at 4.45.09 PM.png

 

Previous post with exactly the same tool path just different post would give this:

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-20 at 4.45.54 PM.png

0 Likes
Reply
996 Views
19 Replies
Replies (19)

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Where is the post from @Anonymous from fusion or from here http://cam.autodesk.com/posts/ This one I don't know if it has been fixed there is a problem with it doing 4th axis work.

 

The Generic post from fusion works fine on windows.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable
It was the one me from the tormach site today
0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

That one is out of date try the Generic post in fusion just make sure you set the rotary table axis in the pre post dialog 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks Daniel - the generic post looks good - I am going to try to run it later.  I did notice the feedrates are crazy high like F9999.9999 and I am using inch mode.

 

 

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable
The generic post didn't work all that great. There were a bunch of errors in pathpilot because it put out G94 moves w no feedrate. There were also some g1 moves with feedrate of F0.

Even worse was that the curves were upside down.
0 Likes

Steinwerks
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous wrote:
There were also some g1 moves with feedrate of F0.


Were you trying to do a chamfer or engraving with a tool defined as a Spot Drill?

Neal Stein



New to Fusion 360 CAM? Click here for an introduction to 2D Milling, here for 2D Turning.

Find me on:
Instagram and YouTube
0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Yer they had not fixed it then worked this out last weekend.

 

Try this one it works  It's set up for 4th on the left side of the machine.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

It has G94 and G93 in it, there controller needs a G01 plus free rate on every line there is a G94, A feed was added to all the G95 lines to keep it happy. It looks like they did not fix it the one on the post page is wrong as well.

The one I posted was to get someone going last week. It's bit disappointing.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

Yes it was a contour w/ a spot drill w/ chamfer settings to 0 i believe.

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

Daniel - the tormach a axis PP.cps post - seems a bit better.

It doesn't post any G94/95 moves.

 

There are several lines of:

N160 G1 Z0.0394 F0.

 

Note the feedrate of 0 - but that is easy enough to edit.

 

I am going to see if the curves are upside down in PathPilot.

0 Likes

Steinwerks
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous wrote:

Yes it was a contour w/ a spot drill w/ chamfer settings to 0 i believe.


This is because there is no lead-in or lead-out feedrate defined in the tool and you'll have to redefine the tool as a Chamfer Mill to work correctly. While I don't agree with that, it is what it is for now.

Neal Stein



New to Fusion 360 CAM? Click here for an introduction to 2D Milling, here for 2D Turning.

Find me on:
Instagram and YouTube
0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

Well, the bigger issue is that the 4th axis is inverted - in other words it is milling concave vs convex.

 

IMG_5608.jpgIMG_5609.jpg

0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Yep That's the A axis going backwards to what you need.

 

Grab the A+ post from here this should flip it back over https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/computer-aided-machining-cam/cylindrical-engraving/td-p/6800056

 

What side off the machine do you have the A axis set Left or right, If it's on the left pointing to the right that A- post should off worked


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

IMG_5609.jpgDaniel - thanks for the advice on the other post.  It seems to work pretty

well.  Yes my A axis is on the left of the table as pictured below.

Interesting is that the tool path still looks inverted in the PathPilot window - but in fusion the tool path looks correct 

Screen Shot 2017-01-21 at 8.52.52 PM.png

0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous can you post the file Brian 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

http://a360.co/2k2iPlg

 

Thanks for helping!

 

Brian

0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

there was a mistake in your file. you had the origin at the top of the part in the setup, It should be dead center like how you had it in the toolpaths you confused fusion.

 

Just changing that it looks better in a back plot. File attached for references. 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Anonymous
Not applicable

Sadly that wasn't a mistake on my part it was intentional as I didn't think it would make a difference!

 

I have a lot to learn!  Thank you for kind help Daniel!

 

It's funny how you see the same folks over in CNCZone and here.  It's a very small world.  Hope you are well in New Zealand!

 

Hopefully I will be getting my Smithy lathe soon - I will post some vids over in the 'zone.

 

0 Likes

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

And I hope it is working.

 

For wrapping in fusion not haveing the setup origin and toolpath origin at dead center makes things go nanananna or have them at different places.

 

It's always the simple things with fusion that can make stuff go Nanananan


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes