Message 1 of 7
Fusion 360 post processor output to UCCNC headaches

Not applicable
07-25-2016
09:09 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
First, I must state that I have spent hours researching this problem before finally deciding to register and post on this forum. I don't wish to upset anyone with a nagging problem that has previously been addressed. I have read every post related to my problem, but no real solution is available.
My machine is a Stepcraft 840 that I purchased last month. It is interfaced with the UC100 dongle device and controlled by the UCCNC software supplied with the purchase. It took me about one week of assembly time to completely build the machine from kit. I did find plenty of errors in the assembly manual. However, the Youtube assembly support videos certainly are helpful.
Before my purchase, I was expecting to use Fusion 360 as my CAD program of preference. As an electrical engineer, I rely on Fusion 360 for all projects. In short, it is a fabulous piece of software for all professional engineers. I have used Fusion 360 for about one year to successfully generate the g-code to control my other CNC machine. The workflow is smooth and painless.
Sadly, though, Fusion 360 and its list of post processors are not enough to adequately control my Stepcraft 840 model. To date, the only piece that I have been able to machine is the Stepcraft logo provided as a sample file to test the machine following its construction. That file had been previously generated by some software other than Fusion 360. Aside from that first test job, my 840 has been useless. I have read about problems that other users experienced. They are the same problems that trouble me, but I have made some progress, as a result of this forum. I thank those members who have posted their results under this section of the forum.
After building my CAD model in Fusion 360 and selecting Mach3 as the post processor, I loaded the g-code into UCCNC only to be surprised by a list of arc error alerts and a toolpath preview that is pitifully inaccurate. I read about another Stepcraft member who posted a UCCNC post processor provided by Autodesk for use in controlling a 4th axis. I tried that processor and the arc errors went away, but now I am left with a toolpath job that extends beyond the 840 machine's Y-axis softlimits, according to the UCCNC warning. In the preview window, my model is, indeed, exaggerated in the Y direction with a ridiculously long toolpath travel that stretches far into infinity. The actual pocket routing toolpath appears decent, though.
At this point, I am out of further suggestions after exhausting my research efforts. I am really frustrated with my Stepcraft 840. It has not served me well and has only robbed me of valuable engineering time. I wish to be among the group of satisfied Stepcraft members who have achieved success with control of their machines via Fusion 360. I have even a UK professionally produced Youtube video with step-by-step instructions for machining carbon fiber material using Fusion 360 and a Stepcraft 840 machine--the exact same setup as mine.
Please pardon my plea for help with a problem that has been previously presented on this forum. Can anybody provide a few tips?
My machine is a Stepcraft 840 that I purchased last month. It is interfaced with the UC100 dongle device and controlled by the UCCNC software supplied with the purchase. It took me about one week of assembly time to completely build the machine from kit. I did find plenty of errors in the assembly manual. However, the Youtube assembly support videos certainly are helpful.
Before my purchase, I was expecting to use Fusion 360 as my CAD program of preference. As an electrical engineer, I rely on Fusion 360 for all projects. In short, it is a fabulous piece of software for all professional engineers. I have used Fusion 360 for about one year to successfully generate the g-code to control my other CNC machine. The workflow is smooth and painless.
Sadly, though, Fusion 360 and its list of post processors are not enough to adequately control my Stepcraft 840 model. To date, the only piece that I have been able to machine is the Stepcraft logo provided as a sample file to test the machine following its construction. That file had been previously generated by some software other than Fusion 360. Aside from that first test job, my 840 has been useless. I have read about problems that other users experienced. They are the same problems that trouble me, but I have made some progress, as a result of this forum. I thank those members who have posted their results under this section of the forum.
After building my CAD model in Fusion 360 and selecting Mach3 as the post processor, I loaded the g-code into UCCNC only to be surprised by a list of arc error alerts and a toolpath preview that is pitifully inaccurate. I read about another Stepcraft member who posted a UCCNC post processor provided by Autodesk for use in controlling a 4th axis. I tried that processor and the arc errors went away, but now I am left with a toolpath job that extends beyond the 840 machine's Y-axis softlimits, according to the UCCNC warning. In the preview window, my model is, indeed, exaggerated in the Y direction with a ridiculously long toolpath travel that stretches far into infinity. The actual pocket routing toolpath appears decent, though.
At this point, I am out of further suggestions after exhausting my research efforts. I am really frustrated with my Stepcraft 840. It has not served me well and has only robbed me of valuable engineering time. I wish to be among the group of satisfied Stepcraft members who have achieved success with control of their machines via Fusion 360. I have even a UK professionally produced Youtube video with step-by-step instructions for machining carbon fiber material using Fusion 360 and a Stepcraft 840 machine--the exact same setup as mine.
Please pardon my plea for help with a problem that has been previously presented on this forum. Can anybody provide a few tips?