Community
Fusion Manufacture
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Excessive traversing between pocket milled holes

9 REPLIES 9
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 10
terence_ibert
554 Views, 9 Replies

Excessive traversing between pocket milled holes

I have 300 holes for a waste board with embedded T-Nuts.  For each hole there is actually the wider recessed bit for 3/4" in diameter followed by a smaller 5/8 diameter for the length of the t-nut followed by 1/4" diameter for the remaining amount of material thickness to the other end of a 3/4" MDF board.  When setting up a CAM tool path, Fusion mills the top holes separately from the deeper holes causing a lot of traversing of the machine between positions instead of simply milling all 3 before moving on to the next position.  I am not able to change this behavior.  Is there something I can do?  Currently the algorithm is extremely inefficient.

 

I've enclosed a screen shot of the tool paths simply selecting 3 hole sets.  This looks even messier with the full 300 on the board. 

 

9 REPLIES 9
Message 2 of 10

With 300 features to select, this may not be the optimum solution but you can change the order of machining using this switch.

 

Preserve Order.jpg

John Hackney, Retired
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 3 of 10

I already tried the “preserve order” option and it made no difference. Could there be a bug?  The sample I provided is only 3 hole sets out of 300 for this example for my request for help. Each hole set has three contour shapes (circles) selected (so 900 separate cuts in total).  The only way I can achieve minimal travel is to manually create 300 separate tool paths.  Not at all practical.  I hope there is a better way.

Message 4 of 10
seth.madore
in reply to: terence_ibert

We'd (hopefully) be able to give you a much better answer if we could see the file.

File > Export > Save to local folder. Return to thread and attach the .f3d file in your reply


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 5 of 10
terence_ibert
in reply to: seth.madore

Please see attached.  Under CAM (Manufacture), the example tool path is "2D Pocket - TEST".  I've suppressed the rest.  The hole edges were selected by set and "preserve order" is turned on.  I'm trying to get the milling to complete each hole set separately before moving onto the next minimizing horizontal travel.  The three sets of holes were selected in sequence to do this but the 'preserve order' doesn't do anything.

Message 6 of 10
seth.madore
in reply to: terence_ibert

Well, this certainly is NOT behaving as I'd expect. 

As a work around for this part, here's what I would do (actually, I'd do this anyways because I'm lazy energy efficient)

 

Pattern.

File and picture are attached

 


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 7 of 10

Just make your all operations for 1 hole and put them into a pattern.

Message 8 of 10
seth.madore
in reply to: johnswetz1982

🤔


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 9 of 10
johnswetz1982
in reply to: seth.madore

@seth.madore  blame the slow forums today. Your post was not up when I started. 

Message 10 of 10
terence_ibert
in reply to: seth.madore

I strive to be energy efficient too.  thanks for the input

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report